Employment Discrimination in the Age of Obama
Even after the election of President Barack Obama, race continues to play a significant role in limiting the employment opportunities of both college-educated and low-wage African-American workers in the United States. This was brought to the forefront recently by both an article in the New York Times and a report released by the Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft def Arbeit / Institute for the Study of Labor report (IZA).
There is a disheartening sense among many educated black job-seekers that — rather than helping African-Americans — the Obama presidency has actually lessened their job prospects. These African-Americans feel that there has been a backlash by some segments of the American public against the president because of his race and — by proxy — against well-educated African-Americans by some employers. The Times article mentions the difficult choice that many black applicants must face in this tight job market between either scrubbing their résumés and applications of "blackness" — by declining to state their race, erasing affiliations with particular social or educational institutions, and even altering their very names — or dealing with the sad reality that some potential employers will deny interviews to qualified candidates based upon their perceived race.
The IZA report was conducted by Princeton and Harvard researchers and used black, white and Latino "testers" to apply for low-wage jobs throughout New York City in 2004. These testers were trained and matched by interview skills, physical attractiveness, and other characteristics then given faux résumés that conveyed similar levels of experience before setting out to meet employers who had advertised openings for low-wage jobs.
The results of the study confirmed what many had long believed about discrimination in hiring practices. While white and Latino applicants received callbacks or offers 31 percent and 25.2 percent of the time, respectively; black testers received positive responses only 15.2 percent of the time. White applicants with a criminal record were more successful than black applicants without a criminal record, with positive responses 17.2 percent of the time — compared to 15.4 percent for Latinos and 13 percent for black testers with similar criminal records. Shockingly, the study found that "blackness confers the same disadvantage as a felony conviction" in employment opportunities.
Finally, the study also cites empirical and anecdotal evidence that employers were more likely to be flexible in evaluating the qualifications of white applicants; as well as employers' penchant for channeling black applicants to less desirable jobs — such as those requiring manual labor or not as much customer contact — than those advertised.
Although the IZA study was conducted in 2004, there is little to suggest that much has changed over the last five years. In fact, it has likely only gotten worse for African-Americans. Whereas in 2004, the American economy was relatively stable and black unemployment was 10.4 percent with white unemployment at 4.8 percent, today, in the throes of a recession, black unemployment is 15.6 percent — twice the white unemployment rate. Further, a report released last Thursday by the Government Accountability Office found that, under the Bush administration, the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division brought nearly half as many sex and employment discrimination lawsuits per year as under the Clinton administration.
Despite the election of the first African-American president, unconscious and systematic forms of racial discrimination remain barriers to African-American success. The recent academic and news reports validate the lived experiences of many African-Americans and document the real consequences of the prior administration's failure to take the important role of the Civil Rights Division seriously. These pieces also demonstrate the continuing need for diversity and affirmative action programs and aggressive civil rights law enforcement by the government as well as organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union — even in the age of Obama.










Dec 10th, 2009 at 2:15pm
I am a white male, I have been out of work for six months, I have a bachelors degree in business, I have over six years of managerial experience. Pleas tell me why I can't get a job, when the mexicans blacks and asianss, are getting the job instead of me?
Dec 10th, 2009 at 6:20pm
Does the American Civil Liberties Union, fight for Native Rights, in violation of Plessy v Fergerson, by the State of Alaska Commercial Fisheries Division Department of Fish & Game used in the Bristol Bay Salmon Drift Net Fishery, and shown best, upholding Plessy v. Fergeson, and "Seperate but Equal clause, by Justice Brown in 1896, use today, By Sara Palin's Board of Fish and Game, in the December 1, 2009, see at Anchorage Hilton, thru the 9th of December 2009, and at the State of Alaska, Board of Fish and Game Web sight!
Dec 11th, 2009 at 2:21pm
The election of the President was never going to change the given nature of the world. People are inherrently divisive in nature. Don't wait for the world to change your situation. You have to change yourself to improve your reality; and keep changing till you get it right. Everyone's eating it hard right now.
Dec 15th, 2009 at 12:13am
Response For #1 white male anonymous, probably you can not spell or you are an expensive baby boomer for their payroll that they need to lay off. Young hiring manager hire only people that can spell correctly and younger than they are. Do not blame blacks and other minorities who are not scapegoats for the white’s misfortune. Which company did you work for? Most companies lay off middle managers to become more lean and mean
Dec 16th, 2009 at 10:03pm
The ACLU does not protect my rights! Never has and never will! I am a white French American and I was fired for helping a black man get a job at Flint Ink, Inc on the day of the Rodney King Riots. Union members tried to murder me twice and was stalking my family for months before I was Arrested and imprisoned just to keep me quiet. I was not allowed a jury trial, nor an appeal. I was not allowed to fire my court appointed attorney and I have not been able to work since 1993 because of this! I can prove that the FBI perjured the testimony of other officers to have me incarcerated but this criminal Govt isnt listening to any evidence I have. FUCK THE ACLU! Sincerely Robert H Poirier Maplewood, MN
Dec 22nd, 2009 at 10:12pm
An article filled with salient information, I admire the work the ACLU does, please keep it up!
Jun 17th, 2011 at 11:49pm
For the third and final time I ask is the ACLU willing to help me up hold my rights? The unemployment I suffer now, could have been avoided had the ACLU taken my case which even the Federal EEOC has deemed viable and has awarded me a letter for the right to sue.
Post new comment