Polarized and Politicized: The White House Office of Faith-Based and Community InitiativesYesterday in a speech addressing a conference sponsored by the Bush administration’s White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, the President said that the faith-based office and its activities are, “bigger that politics.” This statement is Orwellian given all of the evidence that has clearly illustrated just how polarizing and politicized this office has been. The President’s Faith-Based office has been all about politics. We need look no further than the voices of those who have worked for the president and have run this office over the Bush years. They have spoken of their frustrations with how politicized the office had become. They saw first-hand that the effort was, and is, more about politics and courting churches. Unfortunately, the creation of the faith-based office as part of the Bush administration was never about creating a way to better advocate for, and better fund, successful partnerships with all federally funded social service programs; nor has it been about ensuring that programming, and the tax-payer dollars that are allocated for such programming, finds its way to those most in need of services and to those organizations that are most qualified to deliver such services. This is something that has disturbed many who have worked in the faith-based office over the years. David Kuo’s book on his experiences working for the president in the faith-based office tells the tale in great detail. The Administration can spew what appears on the surface to be impressive numbers, but it rings no more true than the “Mission Accomplished” sign in Iraq. Sadly, the faith-based office added little value, less accountability and a whole lot of government-funded discrimination. Yes, of course, one of our chief complaints about this president’s faith-based office is that it does not ensure that ALL organizations receiving government dollars be required to protect the constitutional and civil rights of those receiving services and all employees working in these programs. The Bush administration has eviscerated most of the safeguards that had successfully protected the independence of churches, while also protecting the rights that all Americans have to expect equal treatment when they apply for a government-funded job or when they participate in a government-funded service. This office and this administration have actually promoted discrimination. No one should have to face government-sanctioned and government-funded religious discrimination when applying for a job or when receiving services funded by the government. Should a social worker who is not the "right" religion be excluded or fired from a government funded job because he or she is not of the right religion or has violated a tenet of their religion? Of course not. Discrimination based on religion goes against a core American value. It is not just the discriminatory behavior of the office. It is the lack of fiscal accountability that disturbs me. It is hard to believe that any taxpayer would find it acceptable that the faith-based office is not holding all grantees accountable for where our dollars are going and how they are being used. It has become clear to those who have spent years trying to figure out the specific details of where the money has gone, how it has been spent program-by-program and how successful these programs have been is impossible to track—because in many cases that information does not currently exist. For example, I don’t think I need to bother running through all of the documented examples of the misuse, lack of accountability and sheer thievery that occurred following the dumping of funds into random programs following Katrina. Just as we know of the rampant government-funded discrimination that has occurred over the years. At the end of the day, the real issue is not whether or not an office that helps coordinate and advocate for more and better resources for those in need is necessary, many will continue to debate and discuss its value. However, one thing is clear no matter what is decided; this office should not function as a political tool that panders to and attempts to buy off support from religious communities. Have you noticed that rarely does anyone—including the Bush Administration ever add the words “…and 'community initiatives'” when they speak of this office? This is more than telling. As they say…the devil is always in the details…and that is definitely the problem with the current administration’s misuse of its faith-based office.
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 6 Responses to "Polarized and Politicized: The White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives" |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Jun 29th, 2008 at 8:47am
Yes, I think the Bush administration has been a bit overbearing in it's religious zeal, but so has the nonreligious community(of which the ACLU is a part)in pursuing their assault on Christians in America. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"
Yet, wherever you turn, Christians and their beliefs are being over run.
Jul 1st, 2008 at 6:35pm
Christians are everywhere, a vast majority of this country, and their beliefs are consistently respected. Yet for some reason a small subset of Christians constantly asks for *special privileges*, like the right to lead Christian prayers at government-sponsored events (when Muslims, Bahai, Hindus, Buddhists, Taoists, atheists, etc. do not get to lead public prayers or reflections at the same meetings).
What about strict government neutrality towards religion (or lack thereof) is so hard? If you had a Christian prayer at a government-sponsored event, I would have no problem with it -- IF AND ONLY IF you let all 500 local religious and anti-religious groups give prayers or meditations for the same event too. Of course that might take weeks, which is why the government should just stay away from it.
Jul 4th, 2008 at 6:17pm
I am for socialism, disarmament, and ultimately for abolishing the state itself as an instrument of violence and compulsion. I seek social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class… Communism is the goal.
- Roger Baldwin, founder of the ACLU
Jul 7th, 2008 at 4:41pm
George, you should first cite the ENTIRE quote, then also cite the source from which you pilfered it, unless ofcourse you were AT Harvard in 1938 and were a class mate of Roger's...
Jul 7th, 2008 at 4:43pm
Is there any way to get rid of this facist 'Faith-based" organization from within the White House, or is it too entrenched?
Sep 9th, 2008 at 11:13am
"Separation of Church and State" was meant to prevent politics from corrupting religion, not to keep religious ideals or morals out of politics. It was meant to protect religion. Our Founding Fathers established this great independent nation because they were unable to practice their religious faith in Britain - politics corrupted their ability to practice their faith. Notice how many contemporary American leaders invoke the name of God to push forward their own policies, agendas, and careers. This is reminiscent of Muslim Jihadists and extremists. I believe this can be categorized as "taking the Lord's name in vain".
* http://news.yahoo.com/story//ap/20080903/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_palin_iraq_wa r
* http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/bush-god-told-me-to-i nvade-iraq-509925.html
* http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/09/09/palin_fundamentalist/i ndex
* http://www.observer.com/node/45479
* http://www.bushwatch.com/evangelist.htm
We, our government, and our faith are in dark times as pride, lust for power, and greed slowly dissolve the moral and ethical fiber the American government. It seems our Christianity may soon no longer be about "free will" - one of the most beautiful and compelling aspects of Christianity. We should stop using religion to promote our PERSONAL agendas. We should stop using the founding fathers to promote our PERSONAL agendas. We are corrupting both religion AND the values this country was founded upon. I am deeply saddened by both sides of this issue.