Yesterday the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) sent a
letter to the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) advising HHS to reexamine its position on the Public Health Service Act. The Act requires educational materials to contain medically accurate information about condom effectiveness.
HHS is the government agency that administers federal grants to support abstinence-only-until-marriage programs. This summer the agency announced that the Act's medical accuracy requirements don't apply to federal grantees because: the primary purpose of federally funded abstinence-only-until-marriage programs is not to address STDs, and materials prepared by grantees are for various target populations and not for the general population.
The GAO didn't find either of these reasons to be legitimate reasons for noncompliance, but more importantly
isn't it just absurd that the government's "principal agency for protecting the health of all Americans" goes to such great lengths to ensure that abstinence-only grantees are not bound by federal law requiring medically accurate information regarding condom effectiveness!
I guess we will have to wait and see how HHS will respond and whether or not it will start complying with federal law.
(In case you're curious, the GAO is a federal nonpartisan agency that investigates the expenditure of taxpayer dollars for Congress. You can learn more about the GAO
here.)
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.
We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.
Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.