www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONDONATEABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU

Join Us At:

Oct 2nd, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Rosemarie Philip, ACLU at 4:01pm

Seeking Passionate Youth Activists: Stand Up and Be Recognized!

If you are a high school senior committed to protecting, defending and extending civil liberties in your community, we've got great news for you: the 2010 ACLU Youth Activist Scholarship Program is currently looking for applicants!

Around the country, inspiring high school students are taking a stand for their rights, as well as the rights of their peers. Despite the adversity they face in their efforts, these passionate young leaders refuse to back down! Every year, the ACLU honors and celebrates these civil libertarians through an opportunity to participate in the Youth Activist Scholarship Program.

This year's program will offer 15 high school seniors a $7,000 scholarship towards their first year in college. Scholarship recipients will also attend the "Youth Activist Institute" at the ACLU National office in New York City, where they will hone their activism and leadership skills and learn about civil liberties directly from the ACLU staff. The program is a great opportunity for young leaders to meet other activists from around the country and be recognized for their accomplishments!

Check out the ACLU National website, where you can find more scholarship information and read about last year's scholarship winners and their remarkable achievements towards civil liberties, tolerance, free speech, and equality.

Interested? Contact your local ACLU affiliate to apply. But hurry – the application deadline for many affiliates is the end of November 2009.

Tags: Civil Liberties News

Jul 14th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Deborah Jacobs, Executive Director, ACLU of New Jersey at 4:51pm

Mayor Cory Booker: Please See Me After Class

(Originally posted on Huffington Post.)

In his six months in office, President Obama has disappointed social justice advocates with his positions on issues like gay rights, warrantless wiretapping and, most recently, indefinite detention. We all want to see our president succeed; he generates hope and excitement, and embodies long-awaited change. But we also feel conflicted – while we're sympathetic to the many obstacles he faces to creating meaningful change, the president still needs a resolute front to hold his feet to the fire.

Newark, N.J., a microcosm of Obama’s plight, is a petri dish of a place with a visionary leader who inspires hope. When Mayor Cory Booker took office three years ago, he promised long-suffering Newarkers that he would capitalize on untapped resources, restore public trust in government and honor the civil liberties he has always held close to his heart. He also implored us to hold him accountable, knowing that government depends on citizens to keep it in line.

Mayor Booker has a full plate: reducing crime, confronting poverty and educating students whose schools have for too long failed them. But, in Newark, every plate needs a big scoop of civil liberties. After all, few cities have as extensive histories of civil liberties abuses against its citizens — the 1967 rebellion and riots were fueled in large part by police brutality. The mayor personally experienced violations of free speech and other rights under the prior leadership of the city, as the acclaimed film Street Fight documented.

This week, the ACLU of New Jersey issued Mayor Booker’s junior-year report card on civil liberties; he earned a disappointing C-average. When it comes to civil liberties, the mayor hasn't reached his potential.

The mayor earned his best grades — B’s — in two subjects: open government and immigrant rights. In open government, the mayor swiftly corrected problems, such as his administration’s practice of having corporation counsel scrutinize each response to public records requests.

In immigrants' rights, the mayor has set the right tone and backed up his words, working closely with community advocates to address tensions over day laborers waiting for work in Newark's Portuguese district. He recognizes Newark’s diversity and the importance of defusing tensions between different communities and has demonstrated exceptional grace in discouraging anti-immigrant sentiment, even in the face of political consequences.

However, the Mayor earned unacceptably low grades on two essential subjects: a C- in free speech, and a D in police practices.

Mayor Booker has yet to resolve basic free-speech failures. For seven years, the ACLU-NJ has grappled with the city to stop it from illegally requiring people to purchase million-dollar liability insurance policies before holding public demonstrations. The ACLU-NJ won a lawsuit ordering the city to end this practice and helped the city formulate its free speech policy, but City Hall workers still misinformed people that they needed insurance to exercise free speech in Newark.

The Mayor received his lowest grade, a D, in police practices, the subject that has most direct impact on citizens. The ACLU-NJ has received an unprecedented number of complaints against the Newark Police during the Booker administration. We represent teenagers treated abusively by the Newark police, as well as a newspaper publisher illegally held in custody in an attempt to suppress his First Amendment rights.

Most recently, the ACLU-NJ took on the case of a woman stopped by two Newark officers who apparently had made a bet about her gender. The officers demeaned, harassed and arrested her on false charges.

Our clients who contacted internal affairs for help only encountered further rights violations, including having their complaints lost, misdirected, ignored and even refused, a grave situation given internal affairs’ status as one of the mayor’s top priorities.

At the end of the day, our report card is more than just handing out a grade. We’re looking at the real lives of people in this city and adding up the costs to their rights. While many of the civil liberties problems originated long before Mayor Booker arrived on the scene and some are perpetuated by the culture of the city, the mayor should have made more progress on civil liberties by now.

We recognize that, as with President Obama, the mayor has countless political and economic obstacles. But when it comes to taking decisive action to protect freedom of speech or stop abusive police practices, the citizenry is 100 percent on the side of the mayor’s success. We need him on our side in return. He has tremendous power to better protect civil liberties in Newark, provided he has the will to dig in and take charge.

We hope that the mayor will make civil liberties a higher priority in his “senior” year. Newark can’t have public safety without public trust, and Mayor Booker must earn that trust by respecting the rights of the people. Idealism and soaring rhetoric are inspiring in a politician, but bold actions must follow bold words.

Tags: Civil Liberties News

Jun 10th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Michael German, Policy Counsel on National Security, Immigration and Privacy at 3:49pm

Why Protect Whistleblowers?

(Originally posted on Daily Kos.)

In the weeks leading up to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, FBI officials denied a New York agent’s request to start looking for a known al Qaeda operative who had entered the United States, in what the 9/11 Commission would later call a clear misunderstanding of the law (PDF). The agent sent an angry e-mail warning that “someday someone will die.” At the same time an FBI supervisor in Minneapolis, stymied from pursuing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court order to search Zacharias Moussaoui’s computer by headquarters officials who later admitted to that they did not know the legal standard necessary to obtain one, shouted that he was trying “to stop someone from taking a plane and crashing it into the World Trade Center.”

These agents clearly knew that gross mismanagement in the FBI’s counterterrorism program posed a substantial threat to public safety, but neither formalized his complaint or pushed it up the chain of command. Perhaps, like one third of those polled in a 1993 Merit Systems Protection Board study (PDF) of the federal workforce who did not report illegal or wasteful activities they had seen on the job, they feared retaliation. And not without good cause, since the administrative process Congress created to protect some federal employees in the Whistleblower Protection Act are completely ineffective, as a number of whistleblowers and whistleblower advocates testified in the House of Representatives last month. Worse yet, employees of the FBI, CIA and other intelligence agencies are exempt from even these meager protections.

After 9/1,1 President Bush called on FBI, CIA and other intelligence agents to report any breakdowns in national security and FBI Director Robert Mueller vowed to protect Bureau whistleblowers. But the few FBI employees who answered this call — myself, Sibel Edmonds (PDF), Jane Turner (PDF), Robert Wright, John Roberts (PDF), and Bassem Youssef (PDF) — were not protected. It should be no surprise then that a Department of Justice Inspector General survey (PDF) released in May found that 42 percent of FBI agents don’t report all of the misconduct they see on the job, and 18 percent never report any.

The myriad scandals involving the FBI, CIA and NSA from spying on political activists, to warrantless wiretapping, to torture, more than demonstrate the need for more whistleblowers in the intelligence community. It’s even been reported that the intelligence agencies sometimes lie to Congress about their activities, but Congress has been too slow to protect the brave agents within these agencies that might actually tell the truth. The ACLU vigorously supports meaningful legal protections for all whistleblowers, and particularly for federal employees and contractors within the law enforcement and intelligence communities, where abuse and misconduct can have the most direct consequences to our liberty and security.

With renewed calls for greater accountability over the intelligence community, there is a new effort in Congress to protect whistleblowers. A House bill, H.R. 1507, would finally provide real protections to all federal employees and contractors — including intelligence agents — who are willing to speak out when waste, fraud or abuse of authority endanger our security or violate the law, by providing independent due process guaranteed by the right to jury trials once the administrative process is exhausted. But as important as what this bill does for national security whistleblowers is what it does not do to national security: H.R. 1507 does not authorize intelligence community employees to leak classified information to the media or to any other person who does not have the appropriate security clearances. In fact, by providing safe avenues for agency employees to report waste, fraud and abuse to the appropriate authorities and to Congress, there will be less of a need to anonymously leak information in order to have serious problems addressed.

But there is work yet to do. The Senate whistleblower bill, S. 372, while making some meaningful improvement to the current administrative process, does not provide federal whistleblowers the right to take their cases to a jury and the bill does not extend any protections to FBI, CIA or other intelligence agency employees.

Congress needs access to information about mismanagement and misconduct within the intelligence community, both classified and unclassified, in order to perform its constitutional duty to check abuses of power and ensure Americans' security is being adequately protected. But Congress cannot perform effective oversight unless informed federal employees and contractors are willing to tell the truth about what is happening within these agencies. And it is simply unfair to expect them to tell the truth if they know it will cost them their jobs.

The Senate is holding a hearing on its bill tomorrow. Let your voice be heard. Tell your Senator to extend meaningful protection to the workforce that is charged with protecting us all by granting all federal employees full and independent due process rights when they blow the whistle during government investigations or refuse to violate the law, enforced through jury trials in federal court once administrative measures are exhausted, and “full circuit” review. Perhaps the next time FBI or CIA agents see breakdowns in terrorism investigations, they will have the confidence to report these problems to Congress before another disaster happens.

Tags: Civil Liberties News

Jun 8th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Rachel Myers, ACLU at 3:26pm

ACLU Releases Report On Supreme Court Nominee Sonia Sotomayor

The ACLU today released a report summarizing the civil liberties and civil rights record of Judge Sonia Sotomayor, who was nominated by President Obama to replace retiring Justice David Souter as an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court. The report was prepared in accordance with ACLU policy, and will be made available to the public and members of the Senate.

The ACLU does not endorse or oppose candidates for elective or appointive office.

The full text of the report is online at: www.aclu.org/scotus/2008term/39769pub20090608.html.

Tags: Civil Liberties News, U.S. Supreme Court

May 21st, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Jennifer Carnig, NYCLU at 10:31am

Bill O'Reilly: The New Face of Stop-and-Frisk in New York

The stop-and-frisk section starts at 1:58.

Bill O'Reilly thinks it is "hating America" to be concerned about a racially-biased police tactic that has stripped more than 2 million New Yorkers of their dignity over the past five years.

Bill O'Reilly thinks it is "hating America" to question the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a program in which nine-out-of-10 people who are stopped and interrogated by police are completely innocent and let go without any charges or even a citation.

Bill O'Reilly thinks it is "hating America" to demand that the NYPD treat all New Yorkers with fairness and dignity in their quest to keep the streets of our city safe.

That doesn't sound like hating America to us. That sounds like standing up for equality and justice – sounds pretty American to me.

Tags: Civil Liberties News

Apr 15th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Ed Yohnka, ACLU of Illinois at 12:07pm

In Memory of First Amendment Champion Judith Krug

Those of us in Chicago — and across the nation — who share a fierce commitment to protecting freedom of expression lost a great champion this past weekend with the passing of Judith Krug. A librarian by training, Judith became a champion for the First Amendment whether it was confronting efforts to ban books in pubic libraries (including public school libraries), challenging efforts to force libraries to place clumsy, ineffective filters on public computers with internet access or critiquing the intrusive provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act, especially as those provisions affected library patrons.

She was a robust advocate, who relished the opportunity to advance her position — a position that always advanced fundamental constitutional principles. We appeared together on a number of panels in recent years discussing the USA PATRIOT Act, and it was easy to get “fired up” when Judith was on you side. She never backed away, never backed down and always argued from a principled perspective that was deeply-held and well-articulated.

More than anything else, Judith reminded us never to be afraid of ideas. She saw clearly that the path to personal development and growth comes through knowledge and information, and that information comes through reading from a wide variety of sources. She loved books, loved reading and she shared that passion with young and old alike.

We are better off in Chicago for having her powerful and effective voice emanate from this City and we will miss her.

Tags: Civil Liberties News

Mar 20th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Rosemarie Philip, ACLU at 3:25pm

Congratulations 2009 Youth Activist Scholarship Winners!

This year 16 students from across the nation were picked as winners for the 2009 ACLU Youth Activist Scholarship Program. Each of these graduating high school seniors will receive a scholarship towards their first year of college, as well of the opportunity to participate in the Youth Activist Institute at the National ACLU office in NYC. To learn more about our outstanding winners and their remarkable achievements in civil liberties click here.

You too can join the generation of young people who are fighting to keep America safe and free! At the ACLU, we believe that anyone can be a civil liberties activist: all it takes is staying involved in your community and standing up for a cause you believe in. Around the country, high school students are taking a stand for their rights as well as the rights of their peers; despite the adversity they face, these young leaders refuse to back down.

Congratulations to our impressive group of winning activists, and high school juniors: be on the lookout for details in the fall for next year’s scholarship program!

Tags: Civil Liberties News

Mar 12th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Will Matthews, ACLU at 2:40pm

From NPP to MSNBC

It's a long way from Capshaw, Ala., home of the Limestone Prison, to hosting your own national cable television program from a swanky studio in the heart of New York City.

Most everyone by now knows Rachel Maddow as the host of the nightly Rachel Maddow Show on MSNBC. But long before she was basking in the limelight and adored by millions of fans across America, Maddow was doing the often unheralded work that ACLU attorneys engage in every single day — working to eradicate injustices from some of the farthest-flung corners of our country that might well otherwise go totally unnoticed.

As the keynote speaker at the ACLU of Wisconsin's annual Bill of Rights Celebration last month, Maddow devoted part of her speech to reflecting on her time six years ago as a part of the staff of the ACLU National Prison Project (NPP) which, at the time, was engaged in a campaign that Maddow says she called "No Lost Causes" — to persuade Alabama Department of Corrections officials to end their policy of segregating all Alabama HIV-positive prisoners and excluding them from participation in all the prison programs, services and privileges available to prisoners without HIV. As Maddow relates, never has she experienced "a more satisfyingly cinematic moment" then when she arrived at Limestone along with Margaret Winter, the National Prison Project's associate director, and Jackie Walker, the Project's HIV/AIDS policy coordinator (Maddow starts speaking at 3:10):

Please note that by playing this clip You Tube and Google will place a long-term cookie on your computer. Please see You Tube's privacy statement on their website and Google's privacy statement on theirs to learn more. To view the ACLU's privacy statement, click here.

Enormous strides have been made in the six years since Maddow and the ACLU took Limestone by storm. The ACLU has continued to push corrections officials in Alabama to extend equal treatment of prisoners living with HIV/AIDS, and as a result these prisoners now have access to educational and vocational training opportunities, substance abuse treatment and religious programs that previously had been denied to them. Currently the ACLU is pushing hard to end the last major remaining barrier for HIV-positive prisoners: access to work release and the other critically important early-release programs available to prisoners who don't have HIV, and from which HIV-positive prisoners are still categorically excluded.

Maddow doesn't work for the ACLU anymore, but she hasn't forgotten her roots.

Tags: Civil Liberties News

Feb 12th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Larry Frankel, Washington Legislative Office at 4:08pm

200 Years Of Greatness

Today is the 200th anniversary of the birth of both Abraham Lincoln and Charles Darwin. Certainly this is a day we should take a little time to celebrate their accomplishments and reflect on the significance they still have for those of us who believe in the work of the ACLU.

Just where would we be had Abe Lincoln not fought so hard to preserve these United States and give meaning to the ideal of equality under the law. While Lincoln may not have had a perfect record on issues of racial equality, there can be no doubt that the actions and oratory of the Great Emancipator set in motion the passage of the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments, the very foundations of our modern civil rights laws. While I am sure that we all would be fighting hard for equality even if Lincoln had never been born, his life and achievements have certainly made that task easier.

Charles Darwin has also become an important figure in the fight for civil liberties. While the theory of evolution does not raise First Amendment issues, those who have fought so hard to keep public school students from even being exposed to Darwin’s teachings have consistently found themselves frustrated by the constitutional prohibition against the establishment of religion. For over 80 years, the ACLU has been in courthouses and legislatures, pushing back against those who have opposed and undermined the teaching of evolution in science classes. Every decade provides us with fresh opportunities to fight for upholding the First Amendment against those who seek to inject religion into the curriculum of our public school science classrooms.

And it is not just the principles associated with Lincoln and Darwin that should be remembered. Both of them used words in powerful ways to advance the ideas they believed in. They were masters of the art of using powerful writing to change people’s minds and hearts.

And finally, there is one more reason to be celebrating today. I will be taking great pleasure knowing that those who oppose us when we fight for equality and religious liberty and state are being unhappily reminded by this 200th anniversary that they have been and continue to be on the wrong side of history and progress.

Tags: Civil Liberties News

Feb 10th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Matthew Allee, Washington Legislative Office at 5:33pm

Could the Stimulus Package Prevent Americans From Working?

(Originally posted on Daily Kos.)

Now that the Senate has passed its version of the economic stimulus package, by a 61 to 37 vote today, representatives from each legislative chamber will meet to try and work out the differences between the two pieces of legislation. One significant difference the Washington Legislative Office will have its eye on is a troubling provision mandating the use of electronic employment verification systems (E-Verify) for any recipient of stimulus funding.

The ACLU is troubled by E-Verify because it is known to keep innocent Americans from working. The system checks individuals' citizenship status against their records with the Social Security Administration, a government agency plagued with errors and massive backlogs. This then leads to delays in the hiring of workers, which is harmful to both the employer and the employee. This is not what Americans, nor our economy, need during a time of financial turmoil.

E-Verify was included in the House package, an amendment proposed by Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.), but was not added to the Senate version. Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) was emphatic about proposing similar language, but was not given the opportunity for an amendment vote. This difference in packages will surely be a point of contention for those meeting this week to iron out the two versions, in hopes of having agreed upon legislation sent to President Obama before the President's Day recess next week.

The stimulus package is supposed to put Americans to work, not keep them from it. If E-Verify is part of the legislation sent to President Obama, the stimulus could end up having the very opposite, and very negative, effect.

Tags: Civil Liberties News

 

Quicksearch


© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map