www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONDONATEABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU

Join Us At:

Sep 29th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Suzanne Ito, ACLU at 11:51am

Closing Guantánamo: Not Just When, But How

Since last Thursday's ProPublica and Washington Post article about the unlikelihood of the Obama administration meeting its own goal (PDF) of shuttering Guantánamo by January 22, 2010, Gitmo has constantly been in the news.

With all the discussion, it's important to reiterate that how Guantánamo will be closed is just as important as when.

Recent news reports indicate that the Obama administration will not seek legislation or issue an executive order to institute a system of indefinite detention without charge or trial.

While we are very happy to hear that the administration will not seek new legislation to create a permanent system of indefinite detention, we are deeply troubled by the reported suggestion by administration officials that, even after Guantánamo is closed, as many as 60 terrorism suspects — including individuals with no connection to any conventional battlefield — may continue to be held indefinitely without charge or trial. We oppose the idea that there is a class of detainees at Gitmo who are too dangerous to release, but can't be brought to trial in federal courts.

As Jameel Jaffer, Director of the ACLU National Security Project, said in statement Friday: "In a democracy, there is no room for a system of detention that allows human beings to be imprisoned indefinitely without charge or trial."

Tags: Close Guantanamo, indefinite detention

Sep 8th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Suzanne Ito, ACLU at 5:39pm

Indefinite Detention Sacrifices Human Dignity

Last weekend , NOW on PBS explored indefinite detention in its latest episode, "After Guantánamo." In it, host David Brancaccio interviewed Marine Lt. Col. Stuart Couch, who was tasked with prosecuting Mohamedou Ould Slahi, a Guantánamo detainee accused of 9/11-related crimes. In 2004, Couch became the first of six military lawyers to resign from prosecuting the military commissions cases assigned to them because they disagreed with the commissions' flawed system of "justice," which includes using evidence gained through torture and rigging the trials in favor of a conviction.

Lt. Col. Couch refused to prosecute the case because Slahi was tortured at Gitmo.

In the NOW interview, Lt. Col. Couch explains why he resigned:

We cannot compromise our respect for the dignity of every human being. And that goes to somebody that is alleged to have committed heinous crimes against citizens of this country. That doesn't change the immutable characteristic that they're still a human being, and it's a slippery slope that in the name of national security we decide to compromise that. If we compromise that, then al-Qaeda has been able to affect much more of an impact on this country than they have by driving a couple of planes into the World Trade Center or crashing one into the Pentagon. Because they've torn at the very fabric of who we are as Americans.

"After Guantánamo" also features an interview with Philippe Sands, author of Torture Team. Speaking on why the Obama administration should not create an indefinite detention system, Sands says:

The U.S. has a unique position around the world. There is no country that is more closely associated with the rule of law. That has given the United States, for good and for bad, a tremendous moral authority around the world. If the U.S. loses that moral authority, it will be come that much more difficult for the United States…to protect itself.

…The lot of a democracy is to fight with one hand tied behind its back, hostage to its own values, but a democracy is still stronger than those who face us down…We've got to keep our eye on our system of values, that no man or woman is deprived of liberty without due process. If that is gone, we become like those who seek to do us harm, and we don't make ourselves safer.

You can listen to Sands talk about accountability for torture with ACLU attorney Amrit Singh and Glenn Greenwald of Salon.com in this podcast (MP3). Philippe also wrote a blog post for our Accountability for Torture blog forum, called "Accountability Is Coming to the USA." And go to PBS.org to find out when "After Guantánamo" will be playing on your local PBS station.

 

Tags: Close Guantanamo, indefinite detention, Lt. Col. Stuart Couch, Mohamedou Ould Slahi

Aug 24th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Suzanne Ito, ACLU at 1:01pm

Jawad Released Home to Afghanistan

After nearly seven years in U.S. custody, Mohammed Jawad was released and flown home to Afghanistan over the weekend. One of his defense attorneys, Marine Maj. Eric Montalvo, accompanied Jawad as a private citizen on this trip home.

The ACLU represented Jawad in his habeas corpus case in federal court, which challenged his illegal detention and prosecution before the military commissions at Guantánamo. Of the 200-plus Gitmo detainees who still remain, two facts stood out with Jawad's case. First, his age: he was a teenager, possibly as young as 12, when he was captured. And second, Jawad's former lead military prosecutor, Lt. Col. Darrel Vandeveld, left the military commission in September 2008 because he did not believe he could ethically proceed with Jawad's case.

While in U.S. custody, Jawad was held in solitary confinement and subjected to Guantánamo's infamous "frequent flyer" sleep deprivation program. He attempted suicide in December 2003 by repeatedly slamming his head against his cell wall. Two judges — first his military commission judge, then a federal court judge — ruled that evidence gleaned through Jawad's torture and coercion was inadmissible. Despite all this, there's hope for Jawad's future, as his habeas co-counsel, Air Force Maj. David Frakt, told us in May:

Mohammed finally is starting to have some hope that he may be released sometime soon and see his family again. During our visit, the psychologist that accompanied me asked what his plans were. He said, "You are a doctor, you help people. Major Frakt is a lawyer, he helps people. When I get out, I want to get an education so I can help people. I want to be a doctor and take care of the people in my country."

What Jawad endured is not unusual. In fact, it's pretty common among the detainees at Guantánamo. After years of detention with no end in sight, it's time for President Obama to expedite justice for those detained at Guantánamo. At this point, we should have been able to gather enough evidence to charge those suspected of a crime in federal court. If there's no credible evidence, then continued detention is unacceptable. Indefinite detention is unlawful and goes against America's basic values of fairness and justice. Act now: tell President Obama to reject indefinite detention and close Guantánamo.

 

Tags: Close Gitmo, Close Guantanamo, indefinite detention, Mohammed Jawad

Aug 7th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Ateqah Khaki, National Security Project at 5:52pm

Meanwhile, on a Naval Base at Guantánamo Bay…

Yesterday, White House Homeland Security Chief John Brennan indicated the Obama administration might not meet President Obama’s January 22, 2010, deadline to close the detention center at Guantánamo Bay. When asked about the president’s executive order to close the prison within a year, Brennan stated, "I don’t have a crystal ball. At this point it is unknowable exactly how many people will be transferred next week, month, several months and what the conditions on the ground will be on 1 January and 21 January…Everybody is doing everything possible in the administration to realize the President's goal.”

And as the review process forges on, it is critical that the Obama administration not slip into the same legal swamp that engulfed the Bush administration. Despite a recent victory in the habeas case of our client, Mohammed Jawad, in which a federal judge ordered his release from Guantánamo by August 21, the Justice Department has signaled that it is considering bringing criminal charges against him in the United States. Jawad, who was captured when he was as young as 12 years old, has been detained for almost seven years, on evidence that government itself has conceded - and two judges have found - was illegally obtained through torture.

A New York Times editorial this week recognizes the “belated victory for justice” in the Jawad case. The editorial states:

Mr. Holder should heed Judge Huvelle’s stern warning that bringing criminal charges now would raise serious issues, including the violation of Mr. Jawad’s right to a speedy trial, his mental competency and his status as a juvenile subjected to torture. Even if the government succeeded in securing a conviction — highly unlikely — the sentence would almost certainly be limited to the seven hellish years Mr. Jawad has already served.

There is a broader concern, too. Mr. Obama has assigned Mr. Holder the critical task of reviewing the files of Guantánamo detainees to distinguish those having only weak evidence against them from truly dangerous prisoners. We hope the handling of the Jawad case is not representative of how that review is going.

But some signs are troubling. Another recent federal court decision in the case of Guantánamo detainee Khalid Abdullah Mishal Al Mutairi provided yet another glimpse into how the government is struggling to justify indefinite imprisonments in some cases on flimsy evidence. The judge in that case issued a lengthy written opinion eviscerating the government’s evidence, concluding that, "there is nothing in the record beyond speculation" that Al Mutairi had "become a part of al Qaida or an associated force of al Qaida," as the government alleged. She ordered the Obama administration to "take all necessary and appropriate steps to facilitate Al Mutairi’s release forthwith."

Simply put, as lawyer Kristine Huskey writes in Justice at Guantanamo: One Woman’s Odyssey and Her Crusade for Human Rights, her newly published account of representing Guantánamo detainees:

[P]rinciples don’t really matter much in times of peace. It’s easy to maintain your ideology when everything is stable and life is good; it’s during times of conflict that holding fast to your values really matters. It is conflict that truly tests your beliefs.
We couldn’t have said it better ourselves. We hope that as the Obama administration tries to meet its January deadline for closing Guantánamo, they will keep Jawad, Mutairi and the countless others who have been detained for years without credible evidence in mind. These men will never be able to regain the years of their lives spent locked up at Gitmo, but we could at least send them home without any further delay.

Tags: Close Guantanamo, indefinite detention

Jul 29th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Anna Christensen, National Security Project at 11:38am

Judge Calls Government Case Against Jawad "Lousy"

Despite its recent concession that the bulk of its case against Guantánamo Bay detainee Mohammed Jawad consists of evidence illegally obtained through torture, the Obama administration announced on Friday that it may attempt to bring criminal charges against Jawad in U.S. federal court. This sudden change of course represents the latest in a series of desperate attempts by the government to detain Jawad, who was captured during his early teenage years, without credible evidence and without cause. And even though it now concedes that Jawad's seven-year detention and torture at the hands of the U.S. was illegal, the government still thinks it can circumvent the opinions of a U.S. District Court judge, the Afghan Attorney General, Jawad's former military prosecutor, and countless others, by continuing to hold him illegally and on unsubstantiated grounds.

Jawad, who may have been as young as 12 when he was captured in Afghanistan, has been held for nearly seven years in U.S. custody on the unsubstantiated basis that he threw a hand grenade at two U.S. soldiers. The government's case against him consists almost entirely of statements Jawad made under torture, which have been ruled inadmissible by military and U.S. courts.

U.S. District Court Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle said what we were all thinking when she told the government that its case against Jawad was "in shambles" during a hearing on July 16. Judge Huvelle told the government's lawyers — in no uncertain terms — that their failure to bring a viable case against Jawad, despite having illegally detained him for almost seven years, amounts to an insult to the court and an outrage against justice. Judge Huvelle put it best in her own scathing criticism of the government's lawyers:

This case is riddled with holes. And you know it … The United States Government knows it is lousy. If you can't rely on [Jawad]'s statements, you have a lousy case … The case is in shambles.
Without even illegally obtained statements to rely on, Judge Huvelle asserted, the case against Jawad "has been gutted." And since the judge's opinion represents the final word in Jawad's habeas corpus proceedings, the hearing should have been an opportunity for the government to admit defeat.

Nonetheless, the government refuses to let go. Even though its past reliance on Jawad's coerced statements has been soundly rejected — first by a military judge last fall, then by Judge Huvelle — the government is now trying to circumvent those decisions by asking the court for permission to continue holding Jawad indefinitely while it decides whether to bring criminal proceedings against him in U.S. court. If the government was not able to make a credible case against Jawad while relying on coerced evidence, it will certainly not be able to make a case against him now.

Yesterday, we filed a brief asking the court to deny the government's request. The Afghan government has indicated that it is prepared to receive Jawad immediately and unconditionally, and that the repatriation could be done without any cost to the U.S.

The Afghan Attorney General has already demanded his long-overdue return, and the sentiment that Jawad should be released has been echoed by Judge Huvelle and countless others, including the former lead prosecutor in his case. The administration has entrenched itself in an unsupportable case, but it's not too late to make things right by admitting defeat and sending giving Jawad his freedom back.

Tomorrow, we'll be back before Judge Huvelle for a status hearing. Yesterday, Judge Huvelle ordered the government to turn over a plan for resolving the case by 5 p.m. tonight.

Tags: indefinite detention, Mohammed Jawad

Jul 14th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Anna Christensen, National Security Project at 5:03pm

Indefinite Detention: No Guilty Verdict Required

In her testimony before the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee last week, Denny LeBoeuf, director of the ACLU's John Adams Project, highlighted a number of the most egregious flaws in the military commissions system. LeBoeuf cited, among other things:

  • the use of evidence obtained through coercion (in clear violation of the due process clause of the Constitution, the Geneva Conventions, and U.S. Military Law);
  • the admission of hearsay evidence (inconsistent with international practice in numerous courts, including the International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and the Former Yugoslavia, and the International Criminal Court);
  • the denial of the right to choose one's own defense counsel (a right emphasized by the Supreme Court and granted even to defendants at Nuremberg.)

This testimony, and the evidence which supports it, offer an irrefutable condemnation of the Obama administration's decision to revive the military commissions.

Yet even if the military commissions do go forward (as Defense Department General Counsel Jeh Johnson advocated in his own Congressional testimony last Tuesday), they are marred by an additional glaring flaw: Even if the Commissions do exonerate a defendant of all charges, the Obama administration has claimed the right to continue to imprison the defendant indefinitely. So even if a detainee's case survives the use of coerced evidence, the admission of statements from a shadowy, unnamed source, and the lack of a properly selected defense attorney — even if the defendant is able to overcome these hurdles and demonstrate his innocence — the administration can continue to detain him, on the unsubstantiated grounds that he might "endanger the American people."

Indeed, as President Obama announced in a speech on May 21, these detainees could be grouped with "all manner of dangerous and violent criminals" in federal supermax prisons.

This notion that individuals can be indefinitely detained, on the vague and unsubstantiated basis that they might pose a threat, renders the administration's proposed changes to the military commissions completely useless. Although Johnson claimed in his testimony that the improved commissions would provide a "fully legitimate forum," such "legitimacy" is pure window dressing so long as the President can detain whomever he wants to, regardless of the commissions' outcome.

The Obama administration's mistaken belief that it can legally detain individuals, even if they have been exonerated — albeit by critically flawed commissions — is completely contrary to President Obama's asserted desire to break with the abuses of the Bush administration. If the president truly wants to disavow the mistakes of the past eight years, he must begin by trying these detainees in federal court, and respect the outcomes of those trials.

Tags: Close Guantanamo, indefinite detention

Jul 10th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Nahal Zamani, Human Rights Program at 2:57pm

Time to Practice What We Preach

As President Obama travels overseas, it is a good time to remember the United States’ potential to lead by example. Today, the ACLU ran an ad in the daily Italian newspaper, Corriere della Sera, asking President Obama to restore American values of justice.

The only way for America to live up to its highest ideals is to close Guantánamo, try detainees suspected of a crime in our federal court system, and resettle or repatriate those who are not charged and tried in places where they will not be persecuted, tortured or abused.

While several European countries have recently expressed interest in resettling more Guantánamo detainees, the United States has been unwilling to resettle the detainees here in the United States. Our stalling is not only hypocritical, but detrimental. Closing Guantánamo is first and foremost the responsibility of the United States, and we can’t make the necessary progress without taking the first steps ourselves.

The Obama administration must resettle inside the U.S. detainees that have been cleared of national security threats, such as the Uighurs, members of an ethnic Muslim minority from Northwestern China. Since May 2006, 17 Uighurs have been detained in Guantánamo, four of whom were recently resettled in Bermuda. Thirteen Uighurs remain at Guantánamo despite being cleared of being “enemy combatants.” Negotiations to resettle them in Palau are ongoing, but not final. If Palau ultimately refuses to take the Uighurs, the Obama administration and Congress must reconsider their position and resettle them here (or perhaps the Supreme Court will have to do it for them).

On July 3, President Obama told the Associated Press that the idea of indefinite detention “gives me huge pause.” But recent signs indicate the possibility of a policy of indefinite detention. As the ACLU has said time and time again, indefinite detention would dismantle the constitutional right to due process, protected by the Fifth Amendment. And it would be a human rights disaster.

We cannot have other countries cleaning up our mess. As we say in our ad, the world is watching. It is about time to practice what we preach.

Take Action: Tell President Obama to stop indefinite detention and close Guantánamo.

Tags: Close Guantanamo, Human Rights Program, indefinite detention

Jul 9th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Suzanne Ito, ACLU at 11:01pm

President Obama: The Whole World Is Watching

As President Obama travels overseas, the ACLU reminds him that in order to restore America's name around the world, we must end indefinite detention and close Guantánamo. This ad appears in the July 10, 2009, edition of the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera:

(Click to enlarge)

Tags: Close Guantanamo, indefinite detention

Jun 4th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Ateqah Khaki, National Security Project at 1:16pm

Death by Detention

Last week, our friend – journalist Andy Worthington – reminded readers of a forgotten anniversary: the second anniversary of a death at Guantánamo – apparently by suicide.

This week, the world learned of yet another death at Guantánamo – another apparent suicide of 31-year old Yemeni national Muhammad Ahmad Abdallah Salih – who has been detained since February, 2002. Salih's death bumps up the total death count at Gitmo to six. Of these deaths, five are believed to be suicide.

As Ben Wizner, a staff attorney with our National Security Project, stated, "Tragic deaths like this one have become all too common in a system that locks up detainees indefinitely without charge or trial."

You may recall that back in January, the ACLU and a handful of other human rights groups sent a letter to President Obama asking him to grant full access to the detention center so that we could review the conditions of confinement and make recommendations for revising U.S. detention policies. We were never granted access.

In light of this tragic news, we are renewing that call, and asking for an immediate, independent and transparent investigation into the circumstances surrounding this apparent suicide and the conditions of confinement at Guantánamo.

In an ACLU statement about the suicide, Ben also stated: "There is no room for a system of indefinite detention without charge or trial under our Constitution. Detainees against whom there is legitimate evidence should be tried in our federal courts – not in the reconstituted military commissions now being proposed. Those against whom there is no legitimate evidence must not be given a de-facto life sentence by being locked up forever."

Tags: Close Guantanamo, indefinite detention, national security project

May 21st, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Suzanne Ito, ACLU at 5:07pm

Obama Lays Out Few Details for Closing Gitmo and Military Commissions

We, along with other Americans concerned with the direction of President Obama's approach to national security, watched with bated breath as he gave his much-anticipated speech this morning addressing national security issues including the closure of Guantánamo and the revival of the military commissions. Yesterday, human rights groups including the ACLU met with the president and members of his cabinet and expressed concerns about the president's reported plans for indefinite detention for some terrorism suspects. While today's speech was refreshing in its efforts to acknowledge the importance of the Constitution and the rule of law, we remain concerned about those issues.

Responding to the speech, Chris Anders, Senior Legislative Counsel for the ACLU's Washington Legislative Office stated:

Interestingly, President Obama gave his speech while standing within a few feet of the Constitution. He and Congress should keep that cherished document in mind when considering today's proposals. You can't square upholding the Constitution with pushing for a new military commission scheme that would allow people to be convicted based on coerced evidence and asking Congress to pass the nation's first-ever law permitting the federal government to declare someone dangerous and imprison the person indefinitely without any criminal charges. Congress should reject that proposal.
Denny LeBoeuf, Director of the ACLU's John Adams Project, assisting in the representation of capitally-charged detainees, said of the president's plan to restart the military commissions:
The proposed changes to the military commissions are merely cosmetic and do not erase the spectacle of the Department of Defense presiding over trials where coerced statements and accusations by unnamed accusers are permitted, and where detainees are not permitted to speak about their torture at the hands of the CIA or the military. Military commissions unfairly deprive detainees of meaningful defense resources. This "due process light" is particularly indefensible in death penalty cases.
However, we can certainly agree with the president when he said:
We will not be safe if we see national security as a wedge that divides America — it can and must be a cause that unites us as one people, as one nation.
That wedge, which politicians — including former Vice President Dick Cheney — have been using to scare American into opposing President Obama's plan to close Guantánamo, is dangerous. As we wrote before, it's a slap in the face to our federal judiciary, not to mention those who staff and operate this nation's maximum security prisons, to say that suspected terrorists cannot be incarcerated safely in America.

As the president pointed out, hundreds of convicted terrorists already reside in American jails, and no one has ever escaped from one of our federal maximum security prisons. Closing Guantánamo is key to restoring America's standing in the world, as a beacon of justice and due process.

We were also encouraged when the president said:

I believe that our existing democratic institutions are strong enough to deliver accountability…Congress can review abuses of our values…[t]he Department of Justice and our courts can work through and punish any violations of our laws.
You can support the ACLU's call for accountability: sign a petition to Attorney General Eric Holder demanding an independent prosecutor to investigate Bush-era criminal activity.

Tags: Close Guantanamo, indefinite detention

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page
 

Quicksearch


© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map