CategoriesJoin Us At:
|
No More Frogs in a Pot — Mr. President, Sign the Debbie Smith Reauthorization ActIf you put a frog in a pot of boiling water, it will leap out right away to escape the danger. But if you put a frog in a pot of water that is cool and gradually heat until boiling, the frog will not be aware of the danger until it is too late. Often, the same holds true when we are faced with creeping encroachments on our constitutional rights. This principle was most recently evident as the House and Senate were considering the Debbie Smith Reauthorization Act, legislation designed to help eliminate the nationwide backlog of rape evidence kits and bolster DNA testing of criminals and crime scene evidence. In early summer, the House passed an amendment that would have brought the pot to a boil with cash incentives expanding the scope of state DNA collection efforts to anyone merely arrested for a violent or sex crime, including a misdemeanor sex offense. In addition to eroding the fundamental constitutional principle of innocent until proven guilty, this amendment would have thwarted the goal of the underlying legislation — to reduce the ever mounting backlog of unprocessed DNA evidence from rape crime scenes. The ACLU has continually supported the use of DNA testing as an important crime fighting tool when used appropriately. So we were pleased when last week Senator Joe Biden (D-Del.) came up with an alternative way to reauthorize the Debbie Smith Act without the amendment. The Biden bill will move us closer to realizing a reduction in rape kit backlogs without the heedless expansion of DNA testing to non-convicted arrestees. What that bill shows is there needn't have been a choice between safety and long-held constitutional rights. We urge the president to support this constitutionally sound approach. The Biden bill will enable us to bring criminals to justice and provide closure to victims — without jettisoning our fundamental constitutional rights.
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.
We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.
Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.