|
|
Privacy For SaleRon Peterson has a variety of exciting aliases. "In Florida I'm a female prostitute (named Ronnie); in Texas I'm currently incarcerated for manslaughter," Peterson, a California resident, said. "In New Mexico I'm a dealer of stolen goods. Oregon has me as a witness tamperer. And in Nevada — this is my favorite — I'm a registered sex offender." All of this is thanks to the unregulated data aggregation industry. For decades data aggregators have been collecting information on Americans and selling it to the private sector and the government. This has become a multi-billion dollar industry with companies claiming to have tens of billions of records involving virtually every American. Since September 11, the government has become increasingly obsessed with collecting information on Americans and, to keep up with demand, these companies have developed even more ways to invade your privacy. Data brokers are selling details on almost every aspect of our lives including DNA analysis, purchasing habits and credit history, pilot and gun licenses, eviction notices, and even lists of family and associates. In response to the growing number of cases of mistaken identity the president of backgroundchecks.com stated, “We're not in the business of authenticating the identity of individuals. All we do is report the data that's supplied to us from the courts.” Are you kidding? Currently data aggregator companies function entirely unregulated and pose a serious threat to American citizens. They are not required to prove any of the information they are selling is accurate, there is zero transparency in what agencies they are selling it to and there is almost no way to hold them accountable for any misinformation they provide. Most often individuals have no idea they are even the subject of such an investigation. The Privacy Act of 1974 banned the government from collecting information on citizens who are not already the subject of investigation. To get around this many agencies are just purchasing the information from data brokers. Americans know the importance of individuals having a reasonable measure of knowledge and control over how they present themselves to the world. The government has a responsibility to protect that right and is not doing so. Today the Senate Judiciary Committee is considering a bill called the “Personal Data Privacy and Security Act” (S. 1490) that takes a first step toward regulating this dangerous industry. The bill does not tackle the major issue of whether the government has any right to be collecting this kind of information but it will put in place some desperately needed regulation. The ACLU’s letter of support of the Personal Data Privacy and Security Act can be found here.
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 14 Responses to "Privacy For Sale" |
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Nov 5th, 2009 at 1:10pm
To get around the Privacy Act's ban on collecting data the feds just rely on others to collect it for them? Ridiculous.
Nov 5th, 2009 at 2:08pm
thanks so much for bringing this to my attention. I will surely promote the ACLU view on this matter starting now. I can't believe Obama hasn't done anything about this yet, btw. This is way more important than socializing health care. keep up the good work!
Nov 5th, 2009 at 3:13pm
The "Voices of Guantanamo" video has large portions of the audio removed. What is the deal?
Nov 6th, 2009 at 11:59am
Really I don't get the point of this. I want my privacy.
Nov 6th, 2009 at 12:00pm
why the h do we sell our privacy?????
Nov 6th, 2009 at 12:02pm
gum dum mum tum pum kum sum eum qum xum zum fum gum
Nov 6th, 2009 at 12:04pm
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddffffffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff fffffggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk klllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllll;
Nov 6th, 2009 at 12:05pm
Hi I Paul Marien
Nov 6th, 2009 at 12:08pm
Privacy is not a product we have to keep it wow I am so mad
Nov 6th, 2009 at 12:09pm
Hi I am jj and I play saxophone
Nov 6th, 2009 at 12:11pm
We are not selling it. Other people are taking it and selling us to the government and advertising companies. IT NEEDS TO STOP!!!!
Nov 6th, 2009 at 1:51pm
well how idiotic
Nov 9th, 2009 at 9:42pm
We ARE selling our privacy and freedom. The selling price is proffered security.
I seem to have read someplace that Ben Franklin once said words to the effect, "Those who would sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither." Not ceratin of the quote, but the concept has stayed with me.
Nov 17th, 2009 at 11:20am
& yet be treated like a criminal because the US declares it to be a 'new standard'.
& have your privacy violated, simply because you use international electronic communications...
or dare to travel between countries
or through US airspace.
America abuses the World's privacy rights, but Americans only seem to care about the violations upon Americans... when they think about these violations at all...
Just a thought, but do you think private jet passengers are treated as badly as the rest of us who dare to travel?
I respect my neighbours & strangers, why can't Americans respect the rest of the World?
Spread Love,
BlueBerry Pick'n
TheJeffFariasShow.com