TSA Meets "Resistance" with New Pat-Down Procedures
The Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) even-more-invasive pat-down searches for people who opt-out of the strip-search machines at airports have generated some striking stories of people's encounters with TSA agents. Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic recounts:
At BWI, I told the officer who directed me to the back-scatter that I preferred a pat-down. I did this in order to see how effective the manual search would be. When I made this request, a number of TSA officers, to my surprise, began laughing. I asked why. One of them -- the one who would eventually conduct my pat-down -- said that the rules were changing shortly, and that I would soon understand why the back-scatter was preferable to the manual search. I asked him if the new guidelines included a cavity search. "No way. You think Congress would allow that?"
I answered, "If you're a terrorist, you're going to hide your weapons in your anus or your vagina." He blushed when I said "vagina."
"Yes, but starting tomorrow, we're going to start searching your crotchal area" -- this is the word he used, "crotchal" -- and you're not going to like it."
"What am I not going to like?" I asked.
"We have to search up your thighs and between your legs until we meet resistance," he explained.
"Resistance?" I asked.
"Your testicles," he explained.
The New York Times' Joe Sharkey was manhandled less delicately: "[I] was required to stand still while I received a rough pat-down by a man whose résumé, I suspected, included experience at a state prison."
Another passenger gives an even more graphic description of his humiliating and invasive pat-down here:
He stood behind me and placed his arms around my neck, surprising me with how strong and firm his grip was -- it felt like someone choking me from behind. He squeezed the area around my collar, his neoprene blue gloved hands tickling my ears. And he kneaded around my shoulders, pressing with his fingertips into my muscle, as if he were tenderizing a piece of meat. With my arms held out straight he grasped both his hands around each one and pulled all the way down to my wrist.
Unfortunately, the TSA's escalation from a back-of-the-hands pat-down to a full-on grope is no laughing matter — in fact, they tried to make a more invasive grope the norm back in 2004, until travelers pushed back and the TSA quietly retreated back to lighter touch.
Travelers have the right to opt for a pat-down instead of exposing themselves to the radiation and prying eyes of an anonymous TSA agent in another room. But as ACLU Legislative Counsel Chris Calabrese told USA Today: "Are we giving people two intolerable actions at airports? They can be virtually strip-searched or endure a really aggressive grope?"
That's exactly what the TSA is doing, in its latest bit of security theater designed to try to make us feel safer without actually increasing safety. And it's really no choice at all. As Goldberg points out, "the effectiveness of pat-downs does not matter very much, because the obvious goal of the TSA is to make the pat-down embarrassing enough for the average passenger that the vast majority of people will choose high-tech humiliation over the low-tech ball check." In fact, Goldberg reports that he was told directly by a screener, “That's what we're hoping for. We're trying to get everyone into the machine.”
The TSA's website reports that 317 strip-search machines (a.k.a. "advanced image technology" machines, or AITs) have been deployed at 65 airports across the country. Is your home airport one of them? Check this list, and if you're of the male persuasion and not keen on the naked machine, we suggest you prepare The Resistance.
If you've been forced through an AIT or want to report abuse during airport passenger screening, contact us using this form. We're collecting individuals' stories in order to determine the scope of this problem and evaluate future action. The information you provide in this questionnaire will be kept confidential unless we contact you and obtain your permission to share it with others.




Nov 3rd, 2010 at 10:54pm
This is exactly why I won't fly. I'm not scared of terrorists, but I refuse to submit to such gross violations.
Nov 4th, 2010 at 12:06pm
why cant someone put a stop to these invasive searches? Do our rights count for nothing these days?
Nov 4th, 2010 at 10:20pm
Nope.
Nov 5th, 2010 at 1:41pm
We need to stop this. Please please please report it and please bring legal issues.
Nov 5th, 2010 at 7:47pm
What is the potential for pressing charges if/when a TSA agent touches you inappropriately? In nearly any other situation, their current procedure could easily be considered sexual assault.
Nov 8th, 2010 at 8:18pm
On Facebook, some people are starting to say NO! http://www.facebook.com/pages/Boycott-Flying/126801010710392
Nov 9th, 2010 at 11:59am
Surely the whole naked scanner/invasive pat down is a clear violation of the fourth amendment? Until the TSA is made to at least abide by the same rules as my local cops, I'm not flying again.
Nov 9th, 2010 at 10:34pm
I'm curious about the implication that this procedure would be more uncomfortable/humiliating for a male than it would for a woman.
Nov 9th, 2010 at 11:36pm
If this were the Bush Administration doing this, would it have already been banned due to the outcry as in 2004? Why is the ACLU so patient with this outrageous violation of our privacy?
Nov 10th, 2010 at 5:26am
Why, exactly, does the writer believe this is somehow worse for men than for women?
Nov 10th, 2010 at 9:55am
I have never before supported the ACLU, but I am now turning over a new leaf. TSA has gone too far and needs to be stopped.
Nov 10th, 2010 at 3:07pm
So that the flip is the ACLU doing about this trashing of the illegal search and seizure we are supposed to be protected from???
Nov 10th, 2010 at 7:59pm
I am gay, and this new procedure sounds like a good deal of fun.
Nov 11th, 2010 at 4:02am
I have had several heavy courses of radiation for cancer and have a lifetime limit on the amount of radiation I can have. I have no choice but this humiliating pat-down.
Nov 11th, 2010 at 2:52pm
Could the ACLU tell us what our rights are in the airport in a case of a problematic search?
Nov 11th, 2010 at 6:13pm
I have never supported ACLU before, but also believe TSA has gone way too far and hope ACLU will take action soon.
Nov 11th, 2010 at 8:37pm
http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/tsa-admits-to-punishing-trave lers/
Please help us, ACLU! This has gone too far!
Nov 11th, 2010 at 10:55pm
I will refuse go through the scanner or the groping. So grateful for the ACLU's work.
Nov 12th, 2010 at 10:18am
A government grope of a man's private area can be equally distressing. A tight squeeze of testicles is quite painful.
Nov 13th, 2010 at 4:12am
@ALLPISSEDOFF: Private Co., you have no rights, same as warrentless workplace drug testing rules. That's how.
Nov 14th, 2010 at 8:09pm
Where is the lawsuit? I'll donate the minute it's filed on this one.
Nov 15th, 2010 at 12:27am
Total Sexual Assault...
http://www.ourlittlechatterboxes.com/2010/11/tsa-sex ual-assault.html
Nov 15th, 2010 at 5:27pm
What will happen if I happen to be wearing an athletic protector and opt for the pat-down?
Nov 15th, 2010 at 7:12pm
Not a fan of ACLU, but you might actually get a donation out of me to go after TSA on this.
Nov 15th, 2010 at 7:16pm
Defend John Tyner.
Nov 15th, 2010 at 11:35pm
T%hey touch...it's assault and battery!
Nov 16th, 2010 at 2:47am
Just filed a complaint on the TSA's website and would encourage others to do the same.
Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:23am
I simply do not understand the big deal. The body-scanners aren't invasive and certainly don't show enough detail to be "humiliating." I'm perfectly okay with body-scanners as long as my flight is safe.
Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:58am
Men, if you absolutely must fly, please wear a kilt, commando-style and opt-out of the virtual strip-search.
Nov 16th, 2010 at 3:55pm
Outrageous! 1984 in 2010. I'm not a prude by any means, but groping is groping. Government sanctioned groping is beyond belief.
Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:08pm
This isn't a 'really agressive grope' this is textbook molestation, just endorsed by the TSA instead of by a random guy on the subway.
Nov 17th, 2010 at 1:54am
Next time I fly, I plan to wear a kilt without underwear... Hey if they need to check I have nothing to hide!
Nov 17th, 2010 at 10:36pm
I trust the ACLU will file suit for the American people . I will donate to the ACLU when they stand up for the Constitution.
Nov 19th, 2010 at 5:49pm
Can someone explain to me how the TSA is supposed to detect explosives taped to my privates without feeling there?
Nov 21st, 2010 at 3:52am
TSA = Gestapo.
Nov 22nd, 2010 at 12:10am
Move the responsibility back to the point of purchase. If I am assumed to be a criminal before I come to the airport, I shouldn't be sold a ticket. There should be a process to get on a "Fly List."
Nov 22nd, 2010 at 10:28am
Took Amtrak Acela to NYC from Boston on business instead of usual flight to avoid the TSA gestapo. Much better experience and friendly service. Goodbye airlines
Dec 2nd, 2010 at 1:16pm
We should strike back by becoming hideously obese and all insisting on the pat-down, until the TSA doesn't WANT to touch us anymore.
Dec 14th, 2010 at 10:16pm
Women: Wear a pencil skirt & opt out of the nude-o-scope.
Refuse to go to a private room.
Men: Wear a kilt commando-style as suggested above by Anonymous #29 and #32.
Jam the system; Atlas shrugging will rock the world!
Aug 28th, 2011 at 4:16am
I couldn't stop laughing while getting a patdown; it tickled so much
Post new comment