Equality in Our Pay Envelopes
Today marks the 46th anniversary of President Kennedy's signing of the Equal Pay Act of 1963. That historic act signified our nation's commitment to ensuring that women are not paid less than men for equal work. Upon signing the bill, President Kennedy proclaimed that the bill "affirms our determination that when women enter the labor force they will find equality in their pay envelope." Indeed, the bill helped women make significant strides towards equality in the workforce. Unfortunately, over time, loopholes and weak remedies have made this historic law less effective than Congress originally intended. Therefore, there is no more fitting way to commemorate this historic anniversary than to push for passage of S. 182, the Paycheck Fairness Act, a necessary update to the Equal Pay Act.
There is no doubt that updates to improve the effectiveness of the Equal Pay Act's protections are needed. Forty-six years after President Kennedy signed the Act, women, on average, continue to earn only 78 cents for every dollar earned by men — that's only 18 cents more on the dollar than when President Kennedy signed the bill in 1963. For women of color, the progress has been even slower. This bill would enable President Kennedy's vision to be fully realized, albeit several decades late.
The Paycheck Fairness Act would give employees legal tools to close the wage gap that has held women's economic progress back for so long. For example, the bill would require employers to demonstrate that disparities in pay between men and women working the same job result from factors other than sex. It would also prohibit retaliation against employees who inquire about their employers' wage practices or disclose their own pay to their colleagues. Furthermore, the Act would deter discrimination by strengthening the penalties for equal pay violations and would authorize additional training of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission staff to better identify and address pay violations. Through these steps, the Paycheck Fairness Act would allow our nation to finally move forward in closing the unlawful wage gap.
Last January, the House of Representatives recognized the need to update the Equal Pay Act and overwhelmingly passed the Paycheck Fairness Act with bipartisan support. Recently, Senators Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) and Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) announced that they will take the lead on the fight to pass the Paycheck Fairness Act. Over 31 senators and counting are cosponsors. The bill now has more cosponsors than in any other previous Congress. There is momentum, but more work is necessary. The 46th anniversary of the Equal Pay Act is a good reminder that the Senate needs to follow the House's example of working to finally secure equal pay for equal work for all American workers.
In 1963, President Kennedy recognized upon signing the Equal Pay Act that "our economy today depends upon women in the labor force." This is even truer today. During this financial crisis, women are a critical part of the economic engines that will drive this nation's recovery. However, under no circumstances should women, single-mother households, and families dependent on two wage earners have to struggle to live on less than they rightfully earn. The impact of these pay disparities is felt even more during these times of economic hardship. Now more than ever, passage of the Paycheck Fairness Act is essential not only for women, but for all working families.
Let us celebrate the 46th anniversary of President Kennedy's signing of the Equal Pay Act by pushing for the passage of S. 182, the Paycheck Fairness Act. Passing the Paycheck Fairness Act is the only way we can fulfill President Kennedy's assurance that American women will "find equality in their pay envelope."
— Deborah J. Vagins, Legislative Counsel, ACLU Washington Legislative Office, and Rachel Marshall, 2009 Summer Law Clerk, ACLU Washington Legislative Office










Jun 11th, 2009 at 9:50am
FIRST!
Beautiful work, Deb and R-Marsh.
Jun 11th, 2009 at 6:14pm
congress will get to this once they finish making sure that the constitutional right to bear concealed weapons in national parks is firmly protected. and only then if there is time.
Jun 11th, 2009 at 7:39pm
While that is very good about the bill. In the present day with the economy the way it is and all the Millions of people out of work. This might not be a good time to do this. It is better to have a job then to be unemployed currently. Unemployment is currently at 9% or better and it does not look like it will change soon.
Small business will have to let people go and large corporations will not hire or they will send jobs overseas.
I am being realistic not going on emotion or what we would all like it to be.
Jun 12th, 2009 at 10:23am
If ACLU is for women's right then I have a few questions for them?
Where were you when Miss USA and Mrs. Palin was under fire just because of thier belief?
Where were you when a littleman I mean letterman promotes the word assult on not only young women but to women?
I don't see ACLU stepping up to the plate to condenm letterman or the media
for being so stupid so I guess it's only fair to say that their NOT for WOMEN.
Jun 12th, 2009 at 2:11pm
Maya...From where is all this hate coming. The role of the ACLU is to protect us when government is taking away our Constitutional rights. That did not happen in either situation you mentioned. No government prevented them from speaking; no government punished them for speaking. Their free speech was balanced by the free speech of those who disagreed. That is exactly what our founders intended.
The same is true with the inappropriate jokes told by Letterman and those told about Chelsea Clinton.
Jun 17th, 2009 at 9:46am
Maya very well put. I agree, its now clear that the aclu and womens groups dont respect or care about the women who stand up for what they believe in. If you are a democrap then they will stand up for you. Pretty sad. As long as there are no groups to stand up for ALL women then the bashing will continue. I can bet that if Letterman said that about obamas kids to michelle then it would have been a huge up roar and he would have been fired that minute. Lets admit it they are scared of Palin, as they should be.
Jul 3rd, 2009 at 11:09pm
Rob - worse things were said and continue to be said about all of the Obamas, by non-comedians, without an apology.
Aug 31st, 2009 at 3:44pm
The employee' s that were not given rights is serious; the employee's that had rights and were still not equally compensated or employed is even more serious based on self rights not regulations.
Further, if the employee's are being unfairly treated and rights not worked.
Some one should be of assistance I guess there maybe fear.
Then if it all is true it is possible that the federal deposit insurance claims are of the same factors included not worked for assistance.
The was a bailout or reports.
Maybe someone should care whether a good person was injured and had rights or a not nice person for the self right. What are they saying for these people that were unfairly treated without wage laws and rights. Submit a report or something.....
Post new comment