Capital Punishment | Innocence

Soffar v. State of Texas

Texas Sentences to Death an Innocent Man, the ACLU Appeals

November 18, 2009
A Texas jury, deprived of critical information about the real killer, convicted Max Soffar of capital murder for 4 victims shot in a bowling alley. The jury didn't know that Paul Reid confessed to shooting four people in a bowling alley, that Paul Reid committed a series of armed robberies in both Texas and Tennessee, including multiple-victim robber murders in Tennessee eerily similar to the Houston bowling alley robbery murders.

The jurors saw a police composite of the shooter and a picture of Max Soffar. They never saw the picture of Paul Reid (taken in his then home city Houston only nine days after the bowling alley robbery murders), just like they never heard the evidence of his confession or signature robbery-murder pattern.

Paul ReidPolice CompositeMax Soffar

SECTIONS OF THE BRIEF
> Facts: An Unfair Trial
> Deprivation of the Right to Present Evidence of Innocence
> Deprivation of Right to Present Evidence Challenging Prosecution Evidence
> Discrimination in Grand Jury Selection Process
> Reversible Trial Errors
> Unconstitutional Capital Sentencing Proceeding and Other Errors

 
 
Statistics image