|
Home :
Drug Policy
:
General
ACLU Sets the Record Straight on Federal Drug Sentencing Retroactivity (12/3/2007)
Issue takes national stage, but ACLU fears facts about mandatory
minimums aren’t fully consideredFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: media@dcaclu.org Washington, D.C. – The American Civil Liberties Union today reiterated its support of
retroactivity for defendants serving longer sentences than required by federal
law after the question was raised in this weekend’s presidential debate. The
United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) last month changed federal sentencing
guidelines to make sure people would not serve more than the federal mandatory
minimum sentence for crack offenses. The USSC is now considering whether to make
those changes to the guidelines retroactive, applying them to offenders
currently in prison, not just those who were arrested before the new guidelines
were implemented. The ACLU aims to correct misconceptions about retroactivity. - The Federal Sentencing Guidelines required offenders to serve
sentences
longer than mandatory minimum sentences. The USSC
has acknowledged that the
federal sentencing guidelines for crack
cocaine crimes resulted in sentences
that in many cases were longer
than federal mandatory minimums. If this
guideline amendment is enacted
retroactively, a person would serve his or her
mandatory sentence before
being released.
- Released prisoners would not flood our streets tomorrow.
Prisoners would
be released over a period of 30 years.
- All offenders would first have to go before a court to have their
case
reviewed and argue that they are fit to be freed. People
would not
automatically be released from prison. Offenders who qualify
for release under
the new guidelines would have to appear before a
judge, who would make the
decision as to whether the person should be
released from prison.
The following can be attributed to ACLU Legislative Counsel Jesselyn
McCurdy: "The USSC changed the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines last month because
the commission realized they were unfair. It makes no sense to call a
law unjust
and in the same breath say it should still apply.
Retroactivity doesn’t mean
prisoners will be released en masse; it
means the mistakes in sentencing that
have gone unchecked for decades
will be corrected. Prisoners arrested for
federal crack cocaine
offenses who have served their time should serve only
their time."
|
|