ACLU Challenges Unlawful Strip Search Over Ibuprofen Allegation In School (3/3/2008)
Group Joins Ongoing Case On Behalf Of 13-Year-Old Girl FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: media@aclu.org
SAN FRANCISCO - In legal
papers delivered today, the American Civil Liberties Union joined an ongoing
case to represent a 13-year-old girl unconstitutionally strip searched by school
officials after a classmate’s uncorroborated accusation of ibuprofen
possession. A divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals ruled the search constitutional on September 21, 2007. The panel’s
2-1 decision, which greatly expands the circumstances under which schools may
strip search students, will now be reviewed by the full Ninth
Circuit.
“All it took in this case
was one student pointing the finger at another to trigger a humiliating strip
search of a teenage girl by school officials,” said Adam Wolf, an attorney with
the ACLU Drug Law Reform Project.
“It defies common sense and violates the Constitution for people –
especially adolescents – to be strip searched for ibuprofen based solely on the
uncorroborated claims of another student trying to get herself out of
trouble.”
"Except for emergency
situations, few circumstances ever warrant such harmful intrusions,” said Andrew
Petersen, an attorney with the law firm Humphrey & Peterson co-representing
Redding. “This school treated strip searches as no big deal, although
courts and educational leaders have warned against conducting them for many
years. Several states prohibit school strip searches by statute
and most schools have adopted policies prohibiting or severely restricting
them."
Savana Redding, an eighth
grade honor roll student at Safford Middle School in Safford, Arizona, was pulled
from class on October 8, 2003 by the school’s vice principal, Kerry Wilson. Earlier that day, Wilson had discovered
prescription-strength ibuprofen – 400 milligram pills equivalent to two
over-the-counter ibuprofen pills, such as Advil – in the possession of Redding’s
classmate. Safford maintains a
zero-tolerance policy toward all prescription medicines, including
prescription-strength ibuprofen.
Under questioning and faced with punishment, the classmate claimed that
Redding, who had no history of disciplinary problems or substance abuse, had
given her the pills.
After escorting Redding to
his office, Wilson presented Redding with the ibuprofen pills and informed her
of her classmate’s accusations.
Redding said she had never seen the pills before and agreed to a search
of her possessions, wanting to prove she had nothing to hide. Joined by a female school administrative
assistant, Wilson searched Redding’s backpack and found nothing. Instructed by Wilson, the administrative
assistant then took Redding to the school nurse’s office in order to perform a
strip search.
In the school nurse’s
office, Redding was ordered to strip to her underwear. She was then commanded to pull her bra
out and to the side, exposing her breasts, and to pull her underwear out at the
crotch, exposing her pelvic area.
The strip search failed to uncover any ibuprofen
pills.
“I was embarrassed and
scared, but felt I would be in more trouble if I did not do what they asked,”
said Redding in a sworn affidavit following the incident. “The strip search was the most
humiliating experience I have ever had.”
The strip search was
undertaken based solely on the uncorroborated claims of the classmate facing
punishment. No attempt was made to
corroborate the classmate’s accusations among other students or teachers. No physical evidence suggested that
Redding might be in possession of additional ibuprofen pills or that she was
concealing them in her undergarments.
Furthermore, the classmate had not claimed that Redding was currently
possessing additional pills, nor had the classmate given any indication as to
where they might be concealed. No
attempt was made to contact Redding’s parents prior to conducting the strip
search.
“This type of overreaction
on the part of these school officials is simply indefensible,” said Daniel
Pochoda, Legal Director of the ACLU of Arizona. “It’s a clear example of how the
so-called war on drugs trumps common sense in our schools. It’s appalling for
school officials to undertake such an intrusive search without contacting
parents first, and more importantly, without any individualized suspicion.”
The ACLU joined the
lawsuit as co-counsel with the law firms Humphrey & Petersen and McNamara,
Goldsmith, Jackson & Macdonald. In addition, the National Association of
Social Workers (NASW) and Rutherford Institute, an international nonprofit civil
liberties organization, filed friend of the court briefs in the case in the
preceding weeks. NASW’s brief pointed out that strip searches can have a
devastating emotional impact on students, deeply and irrevocably affecting the
victims’ relationship with their peers and school officials.
Attorneys on the case
include Wolf of the ACLU Drug Reform Law Project; Pochoda of the ACLU of
Arizona; Petersen of Humphrey & Petersen; and Bruce Macdonald of McNamara,
Goldsmith, Jackson & Macdonald.
The lawsuit names as
defendants the Safford Unified School District, vice principal Kerry Wilson,
school administrative assistant Helen Romero and school nurse Peggy Schwallier.
A
hearing in the case, Redding v. Safford,
et al., is scheduled before the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San
Francisco on March 24, 2008.
|