Scott Calls for Reinstatement of Critical Safeguards on FBI Spying (5/21/2008)
ACLU
Lauds Introduction of Resolution Calling for the Repeal of Ashcroft’s
Surveillance Guidelines
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact:
202-675-2312 or media@dcaclu.org
Washington,
DC -- The ACLU commends
Rep. Robert “Bobby” Scott (D-VA) for introducing H. Res. 1211, a resolution
calling on Congress to reinstate the pre-Ashcroft guidelines, which provide
stronger protections from unwarranted, domestic FBI spying for ordinary
Americans. On May 30, 2002 Attorney General
John Ashcroft adopted his own guidelines in order to loosen the internal
policies that guide federal investigations. These guidelines have enabled have enabled the Department of Justice
and the FBI to track Americans’ dissent against the Bush administration and the
government without showing cause or evidence of any criminal activity.
The
guidelines in place prior to May
2002 had worked for more than a quarter century to protect civil liberties while
permitting surveillance. In fact, the post-9/11 Ashcroft guidelines negated
legal protections created by Attorney General Edward Levi in the Ford
administration without having much impact on terrorism at all.
“It has been six long, chilly years
living with the Ashcroft guidelines,” said Caroline Fredrickson, director of the
ACLU Washington Legislative Office. “The Ashcroft Guidelines expanded the FBI’s
scope to allow surveillance of Americans without just cause. It’s time for FBI
to have to reasonable suspicion of a federal crime before it spies on
Americans.”
The Levi guidelines were adopted
after the Church Committee found that the FBI had developed over 500,000
domestic intelligence files on Americans and domestic groups and had clearly
targeted investigations to disrupt the efforts of dissenters. This famed
committee detailed the disturbing extent to which the FBI had spied on Americans
like Martin Luther King, former Navy officer Father Roy Bourgeois, Holocaust
survivor Edith Bell, and other peaceful protestors and advocates across the
political spectrum.
“While previous guidelines ensured
there was cause for and supervision of FBI investigations, the Ashcroft
guidelines enabled the FBI to investigate and undercut free speech it didn’t
appreciate, whether or not there was evidence of criminal activity, said Rep.
Scott. “Under the Ashcroft guidelines, we have even seen college students endure
taxpayer funded FBI interrogations and investigations for simply placing
irreverent posters up in their college communities.” In one case, the FBI resorted to grilling a North Carolina college
student about “un-American materials” in her apartment, such as a poster of
George W. Bush holding a noose. It read, ‘We hang on your every
word.’ While some may argue this is not in good taste, it is far from a
potential act of terrorism.”
“The Ashcroft guidelines have
not only made the FBI less effective in preventing terrorism, they have chilled
Americans' freedom to associate and speak without the fear that their
associations and speech will end up in an FBI database,” said ACLU Senior
Lobbyist Terri Schroeder. “Rep. Scott’s resolution merely calls for a
rational basis for any investigation. Constitutionally protected advocacy of
unpopular ideas or political dissent alone should not serve as the basis for an
investigation. Government investigations should never be employed to disrupt
dissent,” she said.
The ACLU supports replacing the
Ashcroft guidelines with the Levi guidelines in order:
* To end domestic spying like that
documented by the Church Committee report when there was no evidence of criminal
activity
* To ensure the FBI could
investigate anyone as long as there was a rational basis for doing
so.
Rep. Scott’s House
Resolution 1211 expressed: “the sense of the House of Representatives that the
Guidelines on General Crimes,
Racketeering Enterprise and Terrorism Enterprise Investigation as modified on
May 30, 2002 (“Ashcroft Guidelines”) should be rescinded and replaced by the
former Guidelines to protect Americans from domestic FBI spying in the absence
of suspected criminal activity.”
For
more on the Ashcroft and Levi guidelines as well as the history of domestic
spying go to: http://www.aclu.org/safefree/spying/29902pub20070529.html
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/resources/17039pub20020317.html
|