American Civil Liberties Union

Immigrants' Rights:
The ACLU has been one of the nation's leading advocates for the rights of immigrants, refugees and non-citizens, challenging unconstitutional laws and practices, countering the myths upon which many of these laws are based. Learn more about our Immigrants' Rights Project and take action to protect the rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights.


ACLU Membership Conference

Freedom Files - Season 2
Ideological Exclusion

ACLU NewsfeedsACLU News Feed
ACLU Blog
ACLU Podcasts

AFL-CIO v. Chertoff, 07-4472-CRB
08/29/2007

AFL-CIO, ACLU and National Immigration Law Center Challenge New Homeland Security Rule

The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), the ACLU, the National Immigration Law Center (NILC) and the Central Labor Council of Alameda County along with other local labor movements filed a lawsuit charging that a new Department of Homeland Security (DHS) rule will threaten jobs of U.S. citizens and other legally authorized workers simply because of errors in the government's inaccurate social security earnings databases. The rule violates workers' rights and imposes burdensome obligations on employers who receive Social Security Administration (SSA) "no-match" letters that inform an employer of alleged discrepancies between employee records and the SSA database.

Under the new rule, many U.S. citizens and legally authorized workers could be required to be terminated if their erroneous SSA records are not fixed within 90 days of an SSA "no-match" letter being sent to an employer.

ACLU staff attorney Jennifer Chang blogs about the groups representing both employers and employees clamoring to stop this new Homeland Security rule >>

Legal Documents
> AFL-CIO v. Chertoff - Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending New Rulemaking (11/23/2007)
> AFL-CIO v. Chertoff - Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending New Rulemaking (11/23/2007)
> AFL-CIO v. Chertoff - Order Granting Preliminary Injunction (10/10/2007)
> AFL-CIO v. Chertoff - Plaintiffs' Reply Memo in Support of Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (9/25/2007)
> AFL-CIO v. Chertoff - First Amended Complaint (9/11/2007)
> AFL-CIO v. Chertoff - Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (9/11/2007)
> AFL-CIO v. Chertoff - Motion for a Preliminary Injunction: Appendix A (9/11/2007)
> AFL-CIO v. Chertoff - Motion for a Preliminary Injunction: Appendix B (9/11/2007)
> AFL-CIO v. Chertoff - Motion for Preliminary Injunction: Appendix C (9/11/2007)
> AFL-CIO v. Chertoff - Temporary Restraining Order (8/31/2007)
> AFL-CIO v. Chertoff - Complaint (8/29/2007)
> AFL-CIO v. Chertoff - Memorandum in Support of Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (8/29/2007)
> AFL-CIO v. Chertoff - Application for Temporary Restraining Order (8/28/2007)


Press
> Grupos que luchan por los derechos civiles, las políticas migratorias y los derechos laborales presentan nuevas evidencias acerca del impacto devastador de la regla de “no concuerda” (“no match”) (4/25/2008)
> Civil Rights, Immigration Policy And Workers' Rights Groups Present New Evidence On Devastating Impact Of "No Match" Rule (4/25/2008)
> Civil Rights Coalition Charges That Republished "No Match" Rule Will Hurt American Workers (3/21/2008)
> Government Abandons Current "No Match" Rule Harmful to Legal Workers (11/24/2007)
> Un juez impide al gobierno poner en práctica una regla defectuosa respecto a los números de seguro social que no concuerdan (10/10/2007)
> Court Blocks Government From Implementing Flawed Social Security "No Match" Rule (10/10/2007)
> Court Extends Order That Blocks Government From Implementing Flawed Social Security No Match Rule (10/1/2007)
> Court Halts Government From Implementing Flawed Social Security No-Match Rule (8/31/2007)
> AFL-CIO, ACLU and National Immigration Law Center Challenge New Homeland Security Rule (8/29/2007)


Additional Resources
> National and Regional Organizations Opposed to the No-Match Rule (4/25/2008)
> ACLU and ACLU-NC Comments on Proposed No-Match Rule (4/24/2008)
> AFL-CIO v. Chertoff - Safe-Harbor Procedures for Employers Who Receive a No-Match Letter: (3/21/2008)
> Plaintiffs in AFL-CIO v. Chertoff (9/28/2007)


Click to show/hide issues list
Your Local ACLUcongressional scorecardmultimediaforumspublicationssupport usstorecontact