ACLU Cheers Unanimous New Jersey High Court Decision Saying State Can’t Bar Same-Sex Couples from Marriage Protections (10/25/2006)
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: media@aclu.org
NEW YORK -- The American Civil Liberties Union
today cheered a unanimous decision by the New Jersey Supreme Court holding that
it is unconstitutional for the state to bar same-sex couples from the hundreds
of family protections the state provides through marriage. The court referred
the matter to the state legislature, which has 180 days to either amend existing
marriage laws or create some other system to give same-sex couples the same
marriage protections under the law.
“Today’s
court decision is a giant step toward ending the unfairness that same-sex
couples face in marriage,” said Matt Coles, Director of the ACLU Lesbian Gay
Bisexual Transgender Project. “Same-sex couples fall in love,
make commitments and build families just like opposite-sex couples.
And as the court ruled today, same-sex couples shouldn’t be denied the
important family protections that come with marriage. We now
call on the New Jersey legislature to make sure that same-sex couples are not
denied the dignity that comes only through marriage.”
Public
support for marriage for same-sex couples in New Jersey is strong and
growing. New Jersey favors marriage for lesbian and gay
couples 56 to 39 percent, according to a Garden State Equality-Zogby poll of New
Jersey voters surveyed earlier this year.
The ACLU
believes that the only way to guarantee full equal treatment for same-sex
couples is for the state legislature to enact a law granting lesbian and gay
couples the ability to marry. As New Jersey Supreme Court
Justice Deborah Poritz noted in her dissent, which was joined by two other
justices: “We must not underestimate the power of language. Labels set people
apart as surely as physical separation on a bus or in school facilities. Labels
are used to perpetuate prejudice about differences that, in this case, are
embedded in the law. By excluding same-sex couples from civil marriage, the
State declares that it is legitimate to differentiate between their commitments
and the commitments of heterosexual couples. Ultimately, the message is that
what same-sex couples have is not as important or as significant as ‘real’
marriage, that such lesser relationships cannot have the same meaning of
marriage.”
The
plaintiffs, seven gay and lesbian couples who applied for and were denied
marriage licenses, argue that the state violated their rights to privacy and
equal protection under the New Jersey Constitution.
The ACLU of
New Jersey submitted a friend-of-the-court brief to the New Jersey Supreme Court
supporting the right to marriage for the seven same-sex couples. The it brief
was filed on behalf of numerous civil rights organizations -- including the
American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, Asian American Legal Defense and
Education Fund, Hispanic Bar Association and the National Organization for Women
of New Jersey -- in calling for an end to this
discrimination.
For more
information on the ACLU’s fight for marriage rights, go to www.aclu.org/lgbt.
|