American Civil Liberties Union

National Security:
Throughout U.S. history "national security" has often been used as a pretext for massive violations of individual rights. The terrorist attacks on Sept. 11 mobilized our country in the fight against terrorism. However, this also launched a serious civil liberties crises. The ACLU continues to challenge policies like the USA Patriot Act, and creates campaigns like Safe and Free.


ACLU Blog of Rights ACLU Legacy Challenge - See and Hear What Others Have Done

Freedom Files - Season 2
Ideological Exclusion

ACLU NewsfeedsACLU News Feed
ACLU Blog
ACLU Podcasts
ACLU Calls Victory for Right to Counsel in Enemy Combatant Case Positive Step (12/4/2002)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

WASHINGTON -- The American Civil Liberties Union today called a federal court ruling upholding the right to counsel for so-called ""enemy combatants"" a clear rebuke of the Bush Administration and a victory for civil liberties.

""This ruling is a crucial rejection of the Bush Administration's claim of almost unbridled power to unilaterally detain American citizens and hold them indefinitely and incommunicado,"" said Lucas Guttentag, Director of the ACLU's Immigrant's Rights Project and one of the lawyers who filed the ACLU's brief in support of Padilla.  ""The court rightly ruled that Padilla is entitled to his day in court with his lawyer to challenge the government's detention.""  

""The decision is a critical first step to providing a check on the government's use of the enemy combatant designation,"" Guttentag added. 

At issue is a ruling by U.S. District Judge Michael Mukasey that alleged ""dirty bomber"" Jose Padilla (also known as Abdullah Al-Mujahir) can have his status as an ""enemy combatant"" reviewed in federal court, and that Padilla must have access to counsel in the interim before his status is decided.

Last week, the Washington Post reported that the enemy combatant designation is part of a parallel track of criminal justice, which the Administration is developing in an effort to circumvent traditional criminal justice protections of due process for terrorist suspects.

Today's decision makes clear that such a parallel track, devoid of all rights for those designated enemy combatants cannot legally stand.  At the same time, the decision represents only a critical first step in the fight to keep the Administration within the bounds of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, according to Arthur Eisenberg, legal director of the NYCLU and co-counsel on the ACLU's brief.  

In particular, Eisenberg noted, ""the ACLU continues to believe that American citizens cannot be detained indefinitely without charges or trial, even if ultimately classified as an enemy combatant.""

Padilla, an ex-Chicago gang member and petty criminal, was accused in May of conspiring with al-Qaeda operatives to detonate a radiological weapon, or ""dirty bomb.""  In June, the government took the drastic step of declaring him an ""enemy combatant,"" denied all access to counsel and has held him incommunicado and without charge in a Navy brig ever since.  The Administration's strategy had provoked wide criticism in the media and among the general public.

The ACLU's Brief in the Padilla case can be found at: /natsec/emergpowers/14448lgl20020926.html



Click to show/hide issues list
Your Local ACLUcongressional scorecardmultimediaforumspublicationssupport usstorecontact