ACLU Sues Government Over Citizenship Delay For Iraq War Hero
CONTACT: (212) 549-2666; media@aclu.org
KANSAS CITY, MO – The American Civil Liberties Union sued the government in a federal court in Kansas for unlawfully delaying the citizen application of Julian Polous Al Matchy, a highly decorated U.S. Army war hero. The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court with the ACLU of Kansas and Western Missouri in cooperation with the McCrummen Immigration Law Group, LLC against Attorney General Michael Mukasey, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, FBI Director Robert Mueller and two officers of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).
The case is the latest in a string of lawsuits fighting prolonged, system-wide naturalization delays that are the result of lags in FBI background checks known as "name checks," which USCIS's own ombudsman has criticized as leading to rampant delays without any clear security benefit. Because of the delays, hundreds of thousands of citizenship applications have been held up well past the 120-day window established by Congress and the immigration agency itself for processing the applications.
"Our government has failed in its obligation to give a timely decision to long-time lawful permanent residents who have followed all the rules and want to pledge their allegiance to the United States," said Cecillia Wang, managing attorney for the San Francisco office of the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project. "It is particularly outrageous that Julian Polous Al Matchy, who voluntarily enlisted in the U.S. Army and received a Purple Heart after being wounded in battle in Iraq, is among the countless immigrants who have been left in limbo in violation of the law."
Specialist Polous is a permanent lawful resident of the United States, currently stationed in Fort Riley, Kansas. He is a native and citizen of Iraq. He immigrated to the U.S. in May 2001 and quickly applied for political asylum, which was granted in 2002. In 2005, he became a lawful permanent resident of the United States.
Polous joined the U.S. Army in March 2006 and served, among other duties, as a translator. He was deployed along with his unit to his native country of Iraq. In October 2007, he was seriously wounded when a suicide bomber detonated himself 10 feet from Polous and his fellow soldiers. After partially recovering from his wounds, he agreed to another stint in Iraq until December 2007. For his service, he was awarded the Purple Heart, two Army Commendation medals, a Combat Action badge, Gold Combat Spurs and many certificates and letters of appreciation. He continues to receive medical treatment for his wounds sustained in Iraq.
In April 2007, having met all requirements to be come a citizen of the U.S., Polous applied for naturalization. He was interviewed by the USCIS on January 18, 2008. Despite the passage of six months since his naturalization interview and numerous inquiries by Polous and his commanding officers, USCIS has failed to render a decision on his application for citizenship. USCIS has told Polous that he has not yet passed the FBI background check, despite his combat service in the U.S. Army.
"I was proud to serve America as a soldier in the U.S. Army," said Polous. "I love this country and very much want to become a citizen. I hope that this lawsuit helps me and other immigrants realize that dream."
The FBI has always conducted background checks of people applying for U.S.
citizenship. However, in 2002, the USCIS began requiring an expanded FBI name
check, which checks applicants' names against a drastically over-inclusive FBI
database that includes the names of innocent people like witnesses, crime
victims or persons who have applied for government security clearances. When an
applicant's name is similar to a name in the FBI database, the FBI often will
let the name check process stall for months or years because further
investigation requires a manual review of paper files that may be scattered
across the country. USCIS implemented this policy change without giving the
public notice and an opportunity to comment, as required by
law.
"The government is required to make a decision within 120 days
of interviewing any applicant for naturalization. Spc. Polous is not unique in
having to endure such an unlawful delay," said Jonathan Willmoth, an attorney of
McCrummen Immigration Law Group, LLC and lead attorney for Polous. "Julian
Polous has sacrificed greatly for this country, and it is wrong to deny him
citizenship when he has met all the necessary requirements contained in statute
or regulation."
Polous' commanding officer, Col. David Sutherland, wrote a letter of recommendation in November 2007, referring to Polous' "flawless performance," his "willingness to sacrifice greatly" and his "demonstrated record of success."
Lawyers on the case, Polous Al Matchy v. Mukasey et al., include Willmoth of McCrummen Immigration Law Group and Wang of the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project.
The complaint is available online at: www.aclu.org/immigrants/gen/35995res20080716.html