Bush Global AIDS Gag is Harmful to Public Health, Groups Tell Appeals Court
CONTACT: media@aclu.org
WASHINGTON - The American
Civil Liberties Union and 26 public health experts, human rights and HIV/AIDS
organizations are urging a federal appeals court to reject a government policy
that restricts the ability of U.S. groups to end the spread of HIV/AIDS in other
countries.
The policy, part of the "AIDS Leadership Act," requires
organizations that receive U.S. federal funding - regardless of their mission -
to explicitly pledge to oppose commercial sex work. Two federal courts have
ruled in separate cases that the policy violates the First Amendment rights of
U.S. organizations, but the government is appealing those decisions.
"The
federal government should stop playing politics with critical funding needed to
end the global devastation caused by the AIDS pandemic," said Claudia Flores, an
attorney with the ACLU Women's Rights Project and counsel on today's brief. "The
global AIDS gag will further stigmatize high-risk populations and put more lives
at risk. This policy is completely at odds with efforts to prevent the spread of
HIV/AIDS and to treat its victims."
The groups filed a friend-of-the-court
brief in the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia emphasizing the
damaging impact the policy would have on public health worldwide. The groups
also argue that the policy violates the free speech rights of U.S. organizations
by restricting use of their private funds.
Many organizations that work to
prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS often reach out to commercial sex workers to
distribute condoms and offer education on safer-sex measures. Signing an
official pledge to oppose commercial sex workers could lead to further
stigmatization of this high risk population, say the groups, and would undermine
prevention and treatment efforts. Those already infected will be discouraged
from acknowledging their condition and seeking treatment because of a fear of
being shunned or abused. Others will not seek out information or medical care or
may fail to take precautions that stem the spread of HIV/AIDS for fear of
stigmatization.
"Some of today's fastest growing HIV epidemics are happening
among sex workers in developing countries, yet the Bush administration policy
would create an even bigger crisis," said Paul Zeitz of the Global AIDS
Alliance, one of the groups signed on to today's brief. "As the United States
increases its commitment in the global fight against AIDS, we should not push an
agenda that would put more lives at risk."
The groups say that this policy is
at odds with the United States' own HIV/AIDS policies. The premier federal
agencies working to stem the spread of HIV/AIDS in the United States, including
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, have found that isolating
vulnerable groups like sex workers profoundly affects prevention efforts.
Denying all funds from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to
organizations that do not make the pledge is in direct contradiction to this
long held public health practice, said the ACLU.
The ACLU's brief was filed
yesterday in USAID v. DKT International. DKT International, a U.S.-based
organization, was denied federal funding when it refused to adopt the policy
because it would hamper its HIV/AIDS services worldwide, including in countries
with high rates of infection like Sudan, Ethiopia, India and Brazil. On May 18,
2006, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that the pledge requirement is
unconstitutional. That ruling came a week after a federal judge in New York
issued a similar ruling in a separate case, AOSI v. USAID. The ACLU filed
friend-of-the-court briefs in both those cases as well.
In addition to Global
AIDS Alliance, the organizations that signed onto the new ACLU brief are: AIDS
Action, American Foundation for AIDS Research, American Humanist Organization,
American Jewish World Service, Center for Health and Gender Equity, Center for
Reproductive Rights, Center for Women Policy Studies, Community HIV/AIDS
Mobilization Project, Gay Men's Health Crisis, Global Health Council, Global
Justice, Guttmacher Institute, Human Rights Watch, Institute of Human Rights of
Emory University, International Planned Parenthood Federation of the Western
Hemisphere Region, International Women's Health Coalition, National Council of
Jewish Women, Partners in Health, Physicians for Human Rights, Planned
Parenthood Federation of America, Population Action International, Population
Council, Religious Consultation on Population, Reproductive Health and Ethics,
Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States, the University
of California, Berkeley's Human Rights Center and Dr. Jim Yong Kim, Chair of the
Harvard Medical School Department of Social Medicine.
The brief's authors are
Flores and Lenora Lapidus of the ACLU Women's Rights Project and Caroline Brown,
Susannah Vance and Christine Magdo of Covington & Burling LLP.
For a copy
of the brief, go to www.aclu.org/hiv/gen/27371lgl20061114.html