Court To Determine Constitutionality Of Prop 8
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: media@aclu.org
SAN FRANCISCO — Today the California Supreme Court granted review in the legal challenges to Proposition 8, which passed by a narrow margin of 52 percent on November 4. In an order issued today, the Court agreed to hear the case and set an expedited briefing schedule. The Court also denied an immediate stay.
On November 5, 2008, the National Center for Lesbian Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Lambda Legal filed a lawsuit challenging the validity of Proposition 8 in the California Supreme Court on behalf of six couples and Equality California. The City of San Francisco, joined by the City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, and Santa Clara County, filed a similar challenge, as did a private attorney in Los Angeles.
The lawsuits allege that, on its face, Proposition 8 is an improper revision
rather than an amendment of the California Constitution because, in its very
title, which was "Eliminates the right to marry for same-sex couples," the
initiative eliminated an existing right only for a targeted minority. If
permitted to stand, Proposition 8 would be the first time an initiative has
successfully been used to change the California Constitution to take away an
existing right only for a particular group. Such a change would defeat the
very purpose of a constitution and fundamentally alter the role of the courts in
protecting minority rights. According to the California
Constitution, such a serious revision of the state constitution cannot be
enacted through a simple majority vote, but must first be approved by two-thirds
of the legislature.
Since the three lawsuits submitted
on November 5, three other lawsuits challenging Proposition 8 have been filed.
In a petition filed on November 14, 2008, leading African American, Latino, and
Asian American groups argued that Proposition 8 threatens the equal protection
rights of all Californians.
On November 17, 2008, the California Council of Churches and other religious leaders and faith organizations representing millions of members statewide, also filed a petition asserting that Proposition 8 poses a severe threat to the guarantee of equal protection for all, and was not enacted through the constitutionally required process for such a dramatic change to the California Constitution. On the same day, prominent California women's rights organizations filed a petition asking the court to invalidate Proposition 8 because of its potentially disastrous implications for women and other groups that face discrimination.
In May of 2008, the California Supreme Court held that barring same-sex couples from marriage violates the equal protection clause of the California Constitution and violates the fundamental right to marry. Proposition 8 would completely eliminate the right to marry only for same-sex couples. No other initiative has ever successfully changed the California Constitution to take away a right only from a targeted minority group.
Over the past 100 years, the California Supreme Court has heard nine cases challenging either legislative enactments or initiatives as invalid revisions of the California Constitution. In three of those cases, the court invalidated those measures.
The case is Strauss, et al, v. Horton, et al. For today's ruling, go to: www.courtinfo.ca.gov/courts/supreme/highprofile/prop8.htm