ACLU Testifies Today Asking Congress To Narrow Scope Of State Secrets Privilege
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
CONTACT: (202) 675-2312 or media@dcaclu.org
<?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />
“The Bush administration has consistently used the state secrets privilege as an alternative form of legal immunity,” said Steven R. Shapiro, ACLU Legal Director who testified today. “As a result, a broad range of executive misconduct has been shielded from judicial review. The state secrets privilege was never meant to shield the government from accountability or deny victims of government misconduct their day in court.”
The state secrets privilege has historically been used to exclude discrete pieces of evidence from trials, but in recent years the Bush administration has asserted the claim with increasing regularity in order to block entire lawsuits and justify withholding information from the public about extraordinary rendition, illegal wiretapping, torture and other breaches of
The State Secrets Protection Act would put reasonable checks and balances on the executive branch by ensuring that courts can exercise independent judgment in cases of national importance and protecting the rights of those seeking redress through our court system.
“For those who have had their attempts at justice stymied by improper claims of state secrets, this bill could prop open the courthouse doors once again,” said Caroline Fredrickson, Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. “The administration has systematically shut down legitimate cases with its use of this privilege and it is now Congress’ obligation to realign our system of checks and balances. We urge the House to take up and pass Representative Nadler’s bill before other victims of government wrongdoing are denied justice.”
To read Shapiro’s testimony before the House, go to: /safefree/general/36218leg20080731.html