This is a checklist of general categories of state abortion restrictions that apply or may apply to the provision of early medical abortion, including abortion by the use of mifepristone. Not every restriction exists in every state. Not every restriction applies to early medical abortion. This checklist should help guide advocates, abortion providers, and their lawyers in reviewing their state's laws to determine which restrictions apply to the provision of early medical abortion in that state.
State Restrictions That Generally Apply to Early Medical Abortion
State Restrictions That May Apply to Early Medical Abortion
State Restrictions That Likely Do Not Apply to Early Medical Abortion
The laws discussed in this section may be written so broadly as to encompass mifepristone abortions, but were clearly written with surgical abortions in mind (or, at least, abortions in which the patient expels the fetal tissue at a medical facility). If applied instead to abortions in which the patient aborts at home, these laws are not only unnecessary but irrational and excessively burdensome. Accordingly, they may be interpreted by state authorities as not applicable to such abortions or may be susceptible to court challenges. We urge providers in states with such laws to consult attorneys to determine whether they must comply.
Other Legal Issues Relevant to Early Medical Abortion
* States may have examination or disposal requirements, applicable to human tissue generally, with which medical abortion providers must comply. Tables VI and VII, however, list only state laws specifically regulating the handling of fetal tissue.
| Alaska (Planned Parenthood v. Perdue, No. 3AN 98-7004 CI (Alaska Super. Ct. Mar. 16, 1999)) | All or Most Circumstances |
Arizona (Simat Corp. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment Sys. Admin., No. CV99-14614 (Ariz. Super. Ct. May 23, 2000)) | All or Most Circumstances |
California (Committee to Defend Reprod. Rights v. Meyers, 625 P.2d 779 (Cal. 1981)) | All or Most Circumstances |
Connecticut (Doe v. Maher, 515 A.2d 134 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1986)) | All or Most Circumstances |
Hawaii (Haw. Admin. r. 17-17 27-49 (c)(7)) | All or Most Circumstances |
Idaho (Roe v. Harris, No. 96977 (Idaho Dist. Ct. Feb. 1, 1994)) | Life, Rape, Incest, and Some Health Circumstances |
Illinois (Doe v. Wright, No. 91 CH 1958 (Ill. Cir. Ct. Dec. 2, 1994)) | Life, Rape, Incest, and Some Health Circumstances |
Indiana (Clinic for Women, Inc. v. Humphreys, No. | |