ACLU of Ohio Encouraged by Lawmakers’ Approval of State DNA Testing Bill
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: media@aclu.org
COLUMBUS, OH -- The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio today said it was pleased by the passage of State Senate Bill 262 by the Ohio House, which extends the window of opportunity for convicted criminals to petition the state to test DNA evidence to prove their innocence. The bill received widespread support from criminal justice advocates, law enforcement and various legislators.
“This bill is a needed first step that can help correct some of the deficiencies in our justice system and increase the chances that innocent persons imprisoned or on death row can get released,” said ACLU of Ohio Legal Director Jeffrey Gamso. “However,” he warned, “in too many cases there is no DNA to test and this bill will do nothing for those wrongly convicted prisoners.”
The bill allows certain inmates who have already gone to trial to obtain DNA testing. However, the law gives prosecutors virtually unfettered and unreviewable discretion to deny DNA testing to prisoners who entered pleas of guilty or no contest even if they strenuously denied their guilt as they were entering the plea. Additionally, prisoners can rely only on DNA evidence to prove their innocence, which makes the standard to qualify for DNA testing unreasonably difficult to meet.
“Study of DNA exonerations reveals that when innocent people are convicted, they have often confessed to police; there are often eyewitnesses who identify them with certainty; and there are often others who claim to have heard confessions,” Gamso said.“Yet where there are any of these, testing could be denied under this bill as it might not eliminate substantial, even if false, evidence of guilt.”
In Ohio, the Innocence Project, a non-profit organization at the University of Cincinnati, has been responsible for several exonerations. Just last week, 30 year old Christopher Bennett was released four years into his nine-year term for vehicular homicide after DNA evidence proved he was not driving the car that killed his best friend, Ronald Young. Nationally, Innocence Projects have been responsible for the release of over 130 people who were falsely imprisoned for crimes they did not commit. The ACLU said it is currently awaiting scientific testing that may help prove whether Ohio Death Row inmate John Spirko is guilty of a crime for which he is due to be executed in July.
“Whenever an innocent person is convicted of crime, the guilty party goes free. That is a disservice to the victim, to the state, to the idea of justice, and of course to the innocent,” said Gamso. “Unfortunately, for too many innocent persons, there is no DNA to test and this bill will do no good. It remains no more than a needed first step.”
CONTACT: media@aclu.org
Bill is a First Step, ACLU Says; More People Must Have Access to Tests for Measure to Be Effective
COLUMBUS, OH -- The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio today said it was pleased by the passage of State Senate Bill 262 by the Ohio House, which extends the window of opportunity for convicted criminals to petition the state to test DNA evidence to prove their innocence. The bill received widespread support from criminal justice advocates, law enforcement and various legislators.
“This bill is a needed first step that can help correct some of the deficiencies in our justice system and increase the chances that innocent persons imprisoned or on death row can get released,” said ACLU of Ohio Legal Director Jeffrey Gamso. “However,” he warned, “in too many cases there is no DNA to test and this bill will do nothing for those wrongly convicted prisoners.”
The bill allows certain inmates who have already gone to trial to obtain DNA testing. However, the law gives prosecutors virtually unfettered and unreviewable discretion to deny DNA testing to prisoners who entered pleas of guilty or no contest even if they strenuously denied their guilt as they were entering the plea. Additionally, prisoners can rely only on DNA evidence to prove their innocence, which makes the standard to qualify for DNA testing unreasonably difficult to meet.
“Study of DNA exonerations reveals that when innocent people are convicted, they have often confessed to police; there are often eyewitnesses who identify them with certainty; and there are often others who claim to have heard confessions,” Gamso said.“Yet where there are any of these, testing could be denied under this bill as it might not eliminate substantial, even if false, evidence of guilt.”
In Ohio, the Innocence Project, a non-profit organization at the University of Cincinnati, has been responsible for several exonerations. Just last week, 30 year old Christopher Bennett was released four years into his nine-year term for vehicular homicide after DNA evidence proved he was not driving the car that killed his best friend, Ronald Young. Nationally, Innocence Projects have been responsible for the release of over 130 people who were falsely imprisoned for crimes they did not commit. The ACLU said it is currently awaiting scientific testing that may help prove whether Ohio Death Row inmate John Spirko is guilty of a crime for which he is due to be executed in July.
“Whenever an innocent person is convicted of crime, the guilty party goes free. That is a disservice to the victim, to the state, to the idea of justice, and of course to the innocent,” said Gamso. “Unfortunately, for too many innocent persons, there is no DNA to test and this bill will do no good. It remains no more than a needed first step.”