ACLU Class-Action Lawsuit On Behalf of Officers Will Go Forward
LOS ANGELES – In a case brought by the American Civil
Liberties Union of Southern California, a federal judge ruled late Tuesday that
Ontario police officers' rights under both federal and state law were violated
when a police detective installed a video camera in a men's locker room to spy
on the officers.
"We are very pleased that the court recognized the
serious infringement on the rights of these police officers not to have a hidden
camera filming them in the locker room,” said Peter Eliasberg, Managing Attorney
at the ACLU of Southern California. “The violation is all the more
outrageous since police officers, more than any other government employee,
should know what limits the Constitution imposes on installing a hidden camera."
U.S. District Judge Virginia A. Phillips held that Ontario Police
Detective Brad Schneider, who arranged for the camera to be installed, violated
the officers' rights under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution – which
protects against unreasonable searches -- and the state constitution's right to
privacy.
The judge ruled that a jury must consider the evidence to
decide whether then-Chief of Police Lloyd Scharf authorized the surveillance. If
the jury concludes he did, then both Scharf and the City of Ontario would be
liable under the U.S. Constitution. The case will proceed to a jury trial unless
it is appealed by the city.
Sgt. Steven Trujillo said he sees a
better future for the police department and was pleased with the
decision.
"It's a great feeling to know that the judge agreed with
us," said Trujillo, who has been a member of the department for 21 years. "We
feel vindicated. We knew since the beginning that our Fourth Amendment rights
had been violated and now we are ready to proceed to trial to show that the
Chief Scharf authorized it."
In April 2005 Judge Phillips
certified a class-action lawsuit affecting more than 100 Ontario police officers
after they discovered a hidden camera in the police department's men's locker
room in 2003. The lawsuit, which was filed in 2004, is known as Trujillo v.
Ontario.
According to the ACLU’s legal papers, sometime in 1996 a
hidden surveillance camera was installed in a locker room and concealed in the
ceiling at the Ontario police department. The camera provided a view of the door
and the adjacent lockers and dressing area and was connected to a videotape
recorder located in a nearby office. It was discovered when the police
department began the process of moving to a new
headquarters.
Approximately 125 persons have been identified on the
one videotape that the plaintiffs have seen. The lawsuit names the City of
Ontario, the former Chief of Police and others as
defendants.
Ontario is a city of 170,000 located 35 miles east of
Los Angeles. The ACLU of Southern California is representing the
class-action plaintiffs together with the law firm of Bahan & Associates.