Oklahoma voters filed a protest on March 7,
2008 before the state Supreme Court challenging irregularities and questionable
practices in the collection of signatures by the so-called Oklahoma Civil Rights
Initiative. The initiative is one of a series of ballot measures that California businessman
Ward Connerly and his organization known as the American Civil Rights Institute
(ACRI) have spearheaded across the country.
“When equal opportunity and
the civil rights of our residents are at stake, it is critically important that
the electoral process is fair, transparent and honest,” said Chuck Thornton,
Legal Director of the ACLU of Oklahoma. “We are confident that this review will
confirm what has already been discovered – the signature-gathering process was
riddled with errors.”
The legal challenge follows the Oklahoma
Supreme Court’s certification of the ballot measure’s signatures and Monday’s
publication of the signatures’ alleged sufficiency by Secretary of State M.
Susan Savage. Last month, Savage noted in a letter to the court that the
signature count “has resulted in an unprecedented situation where large numbers
of duplicate names and addresses were discovered well into the signature
counting process….[and] it is a reasonable assumption that not all duplicates
have been discovered.” Savage also noted that her report to the court took much
more time to compile than usual “due to the scope and number of irregularities
noted among the signature pages.” Among the irregularities Savage noted were
numerous instances of circulators signing their own petitions multiple times.
If this measure – initiated and funded by California-based
interests – appears on the ballot, it would threaten access to equal opportunity
for countless Oklahomans. Connerly’s similar ballot initiative in California dramatically
reduced the participation of women and minorities in higher education,
contracting, and employment. After it passed in 1996, the number of women
employed in California’s construction industry declined by
33 percent. The number of minority businesses in the state’s transportation
construction industry declined even more sharply, with just a third of such
enterprises in existence in 1996 still in business by 2006.
“It is
well known that Connerly and his front groups have repeatedly misappropriated
the language of the civil rights movement to trick voters into ending equal
opportunity programs in states across the country. But we the voters of
Oklahoma must not be fooled,” said State
Representative Mike Shelton, D-Oklahoma City. “Although we are strongly opposed to
the content of this ballot measure, today’s challenge is about protecting the
integrity of the electoral process in the state of Oklahoma.”
In addition to
Representative Shelton, individuals bringing this challenge include
Representative Jabar Shumate, Fannie Bates, Randall T. Coyne, Bob Darcy,
Bernadette Huber, Rey Madrid, Bernice Mitchell, Earl D. Mitchell,
Jr., and Juanita Vasquez Sykes.
Recently, Oklahoma Attorney
General Drew Edmondson revised the ballot measure’s title to make clear to
voters that Connerly’s initiative threatens to dismantle affirmative action
programs in the state. Nationwide, courts have repeatedly recognized that the
intent of these initiatives is to eliminate programs that promote equal access
and opportunities for women and minorities. Reports indicate that ACRI has used
misleading practices in nearly every state in which it has introduced
initiatives.