Online Censorship Page

New York -- On the eve of a landmark Supreme Court ruling on the federal law criminalizing "indecency" on the Internet, two federal district judges, one in New York and one in Georgia, today struck down laws barring free speech in cyberspace. 

Lawyers for the American Civil Liberties Union, which brought the New York and Georgia challenges as well the federal lawsuit, said the New York law, dubbed "mini-CDA," adopted much of the language of the censorship provisions of the Federal Communications Decency Act, much of it word for word, while the Georgia law criminalized anonymous or pseudonymous online speech. 

The decisions, issued by Federal District Judge Loretta A. Preska in New York and Federal District Judge Marvin Shoob in Georgia, mark the first rulings in challenges to state Internet censorship laws. The ACLU has also challenged a law in Virginia barring state employees from accessing so-called indecency. The Virginia case, Urofsky v. Allen, was filed on behalf of six state university professors and is set to go to trial in the fall. 

New York Litigation: ALA v. Pataki

• Feature on ALA v. Pataki including additional information on the case and information on the plaintiffs        
• Summary of decision in ALA v. Pataki         
• Complaint in ALA v. Pataki  

 Georgia Litigation: ACLU v. Miller 

Legal Documents

• Federal District Court Decision in ACLU v. Miller
• ACLU v. Miller Complaint
• Brief in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
• Reply In Support Of Motion For Preliminary Injunction
  Response To Defendants' Motion To Dismiss     
• Opposition Legal Documents in ACLU v. Miller

Press Releases

• 06/20/1997 -- ACLU Wins First-Ever Challenge to a State Internet Censorship Law in Georgia
• 01/30/1997 -- Georgia Courtroom Gets Wired As Groups Present Evidence In First Challenge to State Cyber-Censorship Law
• 09/24/1996 -- Groups Challenge Georgia Law Restricting Free Speech in Cyberspace   

Witness Biographies

• Bio of Witness Hans K. Klein      
• Bio of Witness Patrick Ball        
• Affidavit of Witness Patrick Ball

 Virginia Litigation: Urofsky v. Gilmore 

Legal Documents

• Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Ruling in Urofsky v. Gilmore      
• Urofsky v. Allen Brief of the Appellees      
• Judge Leonie M. Brinkema's decision in Urofsky v. Allen        
• Urofsky v. Allen Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgement    
• Urofsky v. Allen Complaint  

Press Releases

• 09/20/1999 -- ACLU Gears Up for Next Round of Appeals In Challenges to Internet Censorship Laws        
• 02/10/1999 -- In First Loss for Online Free Speech, Appeals Court Gags Virginia State Employees        
• 02/27/1998 -- Federal Judge in Virginia Strikes Down Restrictive Internet Censorship Law        
• 05/08/1997 -- ACLU Files Challenge to Virginia Internet Law on Behalf of Six University Professors 

State Legislation

• State Censorship Bills

International Censorship

• Hysteria and Net Censorship in the UK

Censorship on Campus

• Princeton Letter         
• Princeton Letter 2         
• Carnegie Mellon