ACLU Letter to the House Judiciary Committee Urging Support and Sponsorship of H.R. 435, the Equal Access to Justice Reform Act (5/22/2006)
The Honorable Lamar S. Smith, Chairman Subcommittee on
Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property House Judiciary Committee Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515
The Honorable Howard L. Berman, Ranking Member Subcommittee on
Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property House Judiciary Committee Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515
Dear Representatives Smith and Berman:
On behalf of the American Civil
Liberties Union and its hundreds of thousands of members, activists, and fifty-three affiliates nationwide, we write to
encourage you to cosponsor H.R. 435, the Equal Access
to Justice Reform Act. It would provide important protections to persons seeking
redress of civil rights or civil liberties violations caused by the federal
government.
Congress enacted the Equal Access to Justice Act in 1980
as a means of ensuring both individuals and organizations the right to effective
counsel in vindicating important civil rights and civil liberties protections.
The protections enumerated in the U.S. Constitution and provided in federal
civil rights statutes are the most important sources of legal rights for liberty
and equality. And those protections extend to include a prohibition against the
federal government itself violating the civil rights and civil liberties of
individuals or organizations. The purpose of the Equal Access to Justice Act is
to provide the resources for aggrieved persons to afford legal counsel to compel
the federal government to abide by the Constitution and the civil rights laws.
Although the Equal Access to
Justice Act has been an important step in providing such counsel, the statue has
several significant limitations and has been curtailed further by court
decisions narrowly interpreting the rights provided by the statute. H.R. 435
corrects these problems, and thereby helps ensure that individuals and
organizations can secure their rights. Specifically, H.R. 435 would eliminate
the “substantial justification” defense that often allows the federal government
to avoid paying legal fees to successful litigants; eliminates hourly rate caps
on legal fees, which are far below market rates, and expands the definition of
“prevailing party” to include litigants who successfully obtain out-of-court
settlements against the federal government or who otherwise trigger the federal
government’s compliance with the law.
The ACLU believes that the Equal
Access to Justice Reform Act will help bring further accountability to the
federal government. Particularly as the federal government accrues greater power
over more aspects of the lives and liberties of the people in this country, it
is imperative that persons who believe that their civil rights or civil
liberties have been violated can have meaningful access to the courts. H.R. 435
would be critical to obtaining access to legal remedies, and we thus urge you to
cosponsor this legislation.
Thank you for your attention to
this issue.
Sincerely,
Caroline Fredrickson
Director
LaShawn Warren Legislative Counsel
Cc. Members of the House Judiciary Committee
|