Oppose Any Attempt to Repeal Longstanding Civil Rights Protections in Head Start (4/19/2007)
Leadership Conference on Civil Rights
April 19, 2007
Oppose Any Attempt to Repeal Longstanding Civil Rights Protections in Head Start
Dear Representative:
On behalf of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR), the
nation’s oldest, largest, and most diverse civil and human rights
coalition, with more than 190 member organizations, we urge you to support H.R. 1429, the
Improving Head Start Act of 2007, and oppose any attempt on the House floor to repeal
longstanding civil rights protections in the Head Start Program that have been in place
since President Nixon signed the law in 1972. We strongly oppose any language that would
allow federallyfunded employment discrimination.* If language repealing civil rights
protections is added to the bill either during consideration on the House floor
or in the Motion to Recommit, we urge you to oppose final passage of the bill.
LCCR opposes allowing government-funded employment
discrimination. Religious organizations have always served as key partners in
providing government services through the Head Start program and current law has not
been a hindrance to their vigorous participation. There also is no controversy over the
exemption under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that allows religious
organizations to have a preference of hiring co-religionists when they are using private funds, but
federal funds may not be used to discriminate. Such a drastic change to the current Head
Start program would be inconsistent with the long held notion that federal dollars must
not be used to discriminate.
The expected amendment would allow government-funded
employment discrimination. Although the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Title
VII exemption for privately-funded religious employers, it did not authorize
federally-funded employment discrimination. See
Corporation of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Amos, 483
U.S. 327 (1987). We believe, based on analysis of Amos, that if federal funds are used by religious organizations to hire only
persons of their own faith, then the federal government is affirmatively acting to advance
employment discrimination.
In the 60 years since Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the first
executive order prohibiting discrimination in federally funded activity, our nation has made
significant progress in the struggle to end employment discrimination and advance equality.
Any attempt to allow organizations to discriminate on the basis of religion with
federal funds would drastically impede that progress and erode a longstanding principle of our nation’s
civil rights policy: that federal civil rights obligations follow federal dollars, regardless of who
receives them.
The courts have affirmed the principle that federal funds cannot
be used to discriminate. The leading case on the question of government-aided
discrimination is Norwood v.
Harrison, 413 U.S. 455 (1973). In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme
Court held that “the Constitution does not permit the state to aid discrimination.”
Id. 465-66. The principles set out in Norwood were affirmed in Justice O’Connor’s opinion in
City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson
Co. 488 U.S. 469, 492 (1989), which stated, “It is beyond dispute that
any public entity, state or federal, has a compelling interest in assuring that public
dollars, drawn from the tax contributions of all citizens, do not serve to finance the evil of private
prejudice.” Her opinion quoted Norwood with approval for
the proposition that “[i]t is … axiomatic that a state may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is
constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.” Id. at 492-93
(quoting Norwood, 413 U.S. at 465).
Under the leadership of Chairman George Miller and Ranking Member
Buck McKeon, the House Committee on Education and Labor favorably reported H.R.
1429 out of Committee by a vote of 42-1. The full House must not change current law to
allow recipients of Head Start funds to have an explicit statutory right to engage in employment
discrimination. LCCR urges you to oppose any attempt to eliminate or weaken the current civil
rights protections in Head Start. If language is added either during floor consideration or
in the Motion to Recommit that repeals current law, LCCR urges you to oppose final passage of the
bill.
If you have any questions, please contact Dan Wolf, LCCR Policy
Assistant at (202) 263-2858/ wolf@civilrights.org or Nancy Zirkin at (202) 263-2880/
zirkin@civilrights.org, regarding this or any issue important to LCCR.
Sincerely,
Wade Henderson President Nancy Zirkin Vice President/Director of Policy
*Some organizations in the Leadership Conference do not join in
this
position because they disagree that allowing religious entities, including those
participating in federally funded programs, to consider religion in
hiring constitutes a threat to
or violation of fundamental civil
rights.
|