President Bush Asking for More Power to Wiretap Americans, Gutting of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (7/28/2007)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: media@dcaclu.org
Washington, DC - The American Civil Liberties Union is responding to
President George W. Bush’s call for the gutting of the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Court. These remarks can be attributed to Caroline Fredrickson,
Director of the Washington Legislative Office of the American Civil Liberties
Union:
"This administration now makes the outrageous claim that they need even more
power to wiretap without warrants. The administration claims the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act must be ‘modernized.’ Actually, it needs to be
followed. The reality is, their proposal would gut FISA.
"Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell, claims that terrorism
has outrun the law, but it is the administration that has outrun the law - and
the Constitution - by trying to bypass the FISA court. Under the proposal that
the Cheney team is floating on Capitol Hill a ‘modernized’ FISA would simply be
a blank check for warrantless domestic and international surveillance.
"The President claims that they need to expand FISA based on new technology.
They are wrong. FISA was written to be technology neutral. There is absolutely
no new technology that cannot be intercepted with a warrant under FISA. None.
Even the man responsible for prepping and filing all FISA applications, James
Baker, head of the Justice Department’s Office of Intelligence Policy and
Review, has said that, 'There’s no type of collection that’s prohibited by the
statute.’ By the way, FISA was modernized by the Patriot Act, by
Intelligence Reform legislation and by the re-authorization of the Patriot Act.
In fact, FISA has been updated 50 times since it was enacted in 1978.
"It takes an enormous amount of hubris to ask for more power on the heels of
revelations that the President tried to go around his own attorney general on
his NSA domestic electronic eavesdropping program. The already-shaky legal
ground on which this domestic spying program stood is crumbling beneath those
who defend it.
"With former Deputy Attorney General James Comey’s damning testimony about
the 2004 late-night visit to the sickbed of former Attorney General John
Ashcroft to reauthorize the program, there is no legal curtain to hide behind.
When John Ashcroft is one of the voices speaking up for privacy, the ACLU takes
notice and so should the American people.
"Hidden in this bill is a disturbing provision that would give complete
immunity - from criminal prosecution as well as civil liability - for the
telecom companies’ participation in the National Security Agency’s illegal
warrantless wiretapping program. It is unprecedented and undemocratic to give
retroactive and sweeping immunity to an entire industry. Not to mention, giving
blanket immunity before a full and public airing of the facts. The telecom
companies should not be handed a congressional pardon for breaking privacy laws.
Who exactly is the administration looking out for when they ask Congress to let
the phone companies off the hook for violating Americans’ privacy?
"Not for lack of trying, Congress has made little progress in finding out
more about the administration’s various violations of FISA during the their
warrantless wiretapping program. The Senate Judiciary Committee has asked
politely for the legal rationale for the program nine times before issuing
subpoenas, and has not yet gotten an answer due to consistent stonewalling by
the administration and the Department of Justice.
"The NSA program was and is a fundamental violation of the rights of
Americans. The American public and their elected Senators and Representatives do
not yet know the full extent of the warrantless wiretapping program or the
extent to which FISA has been violated.
"This is not the time to hand even more power to an administration that has
permitted the wholesale abuse of civil liberties; has denied the legislative
branch’s constitutionally mandated oversight role and refused to hold the
attorney general accountable for a series of conflicting claims that defy logic,
the law and common sense. The only thing more outrageous than the
administration’s call for even more unfettered power is a Congress that would
consider giving it to them."
|