ACLU Slams Wider Spying By NSA, Demands Congress Rein in Spy Powers, Block Telecom Immunity (12/16/2007)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: (202) 675-2312 or
media@dcaclu.org
Washington, DC – This week the Senate will consider making vast changes to
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and will determine whether
telecommunications companies should be held liable for their role in President
Bush’s warrantless wiretapping program. The New York Times ran a story
today that elaborated on the administration and National Security Agency’s
domestic spying partnerships with certain phone companies. The following is a
statement from Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU Washington Legislative
Office.
"When the FISA Amendments Act of 2007 comes to the Senate floor this week,
Congress has a duty and an opportunity to protect the Fourth Amendment and rein
in the executive's spying power. As the administration uses advances in
technology to anchor its requests for more surveillance power, it makes no
effort to ensure that Americans' privacy rights advance proportionately.
Congress also has the power to stand up and declare that 'because the president
said so' is not a legal defense and to block sweeping immunity for the telecom
companies. Senators must vote no on the Senate Intelligence Committee's bill,
which so disturbingly mirrors the disastrous Protect America Act, to ensure that
the president understands that Congress is not a mail order catalog but a
co-equal branch of government.
"Today's article in The New York Times is further proof that
the ties between the administration and telecommunications companies are
perilously tangled. It seems the basis for the push to expand the FISA is as
broad as we feared. The administration has claimed that is seeking merely
foreign intelligence and that the intelligence is for national security purposes
only. We see now that those claims are a part of a larger and more chilling
picture.
"Those who have filed the over 40 legitimate cases against the telecom
companies deserve their day in court - especially now that what we thought we
knew about the companies' involvement in domestic spying was, perhaps, just the
tip of the iceberg. It becomes clearer and clearer just how in the dark
Americans are when it comes to the surveillance they are subject to under this
administration. It seems that the more we learn, the less we know."
To read more about FISA, go to: www.aclu.org/fisa
|