ACLU Opposes Government’s Attempt to Throw Out Rendition Case Under Guise of "State Secrets" (12/14/2007)
Former Boeing Subsidiary Employee
Says He Was Told About "Torture Flights"
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: media@aclu.org; (212) 549-2666 NEW YORK – The
American Civil Liberties Union today filed legal
papers opposing the CIA’s
attempt to throw out a lawsuit against Boeing
subsidiary Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.
for its participation in the CIA’s
"extraordinary rendition" program. The ACLU
charged that the
U.S. government
is improperly invoking the "state secrets"
privilege to avoid judicial scrutiny
of this unlawful policy.
"Once again, the CIA is seeking to cut off judicial inquiry
in order to avoid accountability for its illegal torture policies," said Ben
Wizner, a staff attorney with the ACLU’s National Legal Department. "The
government’s motion, which purports to protect the nation from disclosure of
information that the entire world already knows, is a cynical attempt to cover
up an illegal and immoral program under the guise of national security."
Today’s filing comes in a lawsuit filed by the ACLU on behalf
of five victims of the rendition program who were kidnapped and secretly
transferred by the CIA to U.S.-run overseas prisons or foreign intelligence
agencies where they were interrogated and tortured. According to the
lawsuit, Jeppesen knowingly provided flight planning and essential logistical
support to aircraft and crew used by the CIA for the clandestine rendition
flights. After the lawsuit was filed, the
U.S. government
intervened to seek its dismissal, contending that further litigation of the case
would be harmful to national security. However, the information needed to
pursue this lawsuit, including details about the rendition program, is already
in the public domain.
Jeppesen’s involvement in the program is also a matter of
public record. It has been confirmed by extensive documentary evidence and
eyewitness testimony, including the sworn declaration of former Jeppesen
employee Sean Belcher, which was submitted in support of today’s ACLU filing.
Belcher reports that Bob Overby, a senior Jeppesen official, announced at a
company meeting for new employees that Jeppesen did "all the extraordinary
rendition flights," which he then described as "torture flights." According
to Belcher, Overby added, "Let’s face it, some of these flights end up this
way," and spoke about how profitable these flights were.
"Five men have been brutally abused with the help of a
U.S.
corporation, and they deserve their day in court," said Steven Watt, a staff
attorney with the ACLU’s Human Rights Program. "Jeppesen must not be given a
free pass for its profitable participation in a torture program."
It has been 50 years since the United States Supreme Court
last reviewed the use of the "state secrets" privilege. In recent years, the
government has asserted this claim with increasing regularity in an attempt to
throw out lawsuits and justify withholding information from the public not only
about the rendition program, but also about illegal wiretapping, torture, and
other breaches of
U.S. and
international law. The Supreme Court recently refused to review the "state
secrets" privilege in a lawsuit brought by Khaled El-Masri, a German citizen
also represented by the ACLU, who was kidnapped and rendered to detention,
interrogation, and torture in a CIA "black site" prison in
Afghanistan.
The Jeppesen lawsuit was brought on behalf of five rendition victims: Binyam
Mohamed, Abou Elkassim Britel, Ahmed Agiza, Mohamed Farag Ahmad Bashmilah, and
Bisher Al-Rawi.
The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California.
In addition to Wizner and Watt, attorneys on the Jeppesen lawsuit are
national ACLU Legal Director Steven Shapiro, Jameel Jaffer of the national ACLU,
Ann Brick of the ACLU of Northern California, Paul Hoffman of Schonbrun DeSimone
Seplow Harris & Hoffman LLP, and Hope Metcalf of the Yale Law School
Lowenstein Clinic. In addition, Margaret L. Satterthwaite of the
International Human Rights Clinic of New York University School of Law
represents Bashmilah, and Clive Stafford-Smith and Zachary Katznelson represent
Mohamed.
A copy of the ACLU’s brief can be found online at: www.aclu.org/safefree/rendition/33205lgl20071214.html
A copy of the declaration of Sean Belcher can be found online
at: www.aclu.org/safefree/rendition/33223lgl20071015.html
More information on the ACLU’s lawsuit against Jeppesen, the
rendition victims it represents, and other work in its fight against rendition
can be found online at:
www.aclu.org/rendition
|