Belgians Confirm Illegality Of SWIFT Surveillance Program, Setting Up Showdown Over U.S. Privacy Laws (9/28/2006)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: media@aclu.org
ACLU Calls On Financial Cooperative To Follow The Law, End Program
NEW YORK - Belgium’s announcement today that the U.S. government’s secret
surveillance of international bank transfers violates their national privacy law
sets up a showdown between American and European privacy laws and highlights the
need for the United States to end its ill-considered spying program and bring
its privacy laws up to international standards, the American Civil Liberties
Union said today.
“This important development confirms what we’ve been saying: the SWIFT
program is a violation of European privacy laws,” said Barry Steinhardt,
Director of the ACLU’s Technology and Liberty Project. “It also makes clear that
in a world where our allies have all incorporated basic privacy principles into
their laws, the United States cannot expect to run roughshod over basic privacy
standards without opposition.”
The report was prepared by the Privacy Commission of Belgium (the country in
which SWIFT is headquartered) and presented at a press conference today by the
Prime Minister of Belgium, Guy Verhofstadt. The commission observed that
SWIFT was caught between divergent American and European laws on privacy, but
found that SWIFT “should have complied with its obligations under the Belgian
privacy law,” and “should have been aware that the fundamental principles of
European law were to be observed.” It cited fundamental privacy principles
that had been violated: proportionality in the collection of data, limited
retention periods, transparency, independent oversight, and adequate protections
for data.
Verhofstadt called for talks between the United States and the European Union
to attempt to bridge the gap on what kinds of privacy protections are
needed.
“It is sad to once again see the America, with all of its proud traditions,
standing on the wrong side when it comes to basic principles of fairness and
privacy that are recognized around the world,” said Steinhardt. “And it is
sad that we have to rely on the Europeans to get to the bottom of this since we
in the United States have no independent privacy commissioner that can
investigate.”
Earlier this week, the ACLU and Privacy International released a research
memorandum it prepared for European privacy commissioners demonstrating that the
consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton, which the government enlisted to audit the
SWIFT program, had such extensive ties to government security agencies that its
objectivity in that role was called into significant question.
The Belgian report is online at: www.privacycommission.be/communiqu%E9s/AV37-2006.pdf
An English translation of the report summary is at: www.aclu.org/safefree/spying/26942pub20060928.html
The ACLU-PI memo on Booz Allen can be found at: www.aclu.org/safefree/spying/26808prs20060926.html
|