American Civil Liberties Union

ACLU Freedom Files

Freedom Files - Season 2
Ideological Exclusion

ACLU NewsfeedsACLU News Feed
ACLU Blog
ACLU Podcasts

Kowalski v. Tesmer, 03-407
09/08/2004

CRIMINAL JUSTICE/RIGHTS OF THE POOR

Reviewing whether indigent criminal defendants in Michigan are entitled to appointed counsel on their first appeal, even if they plead guilty. DECIDED

In Michigan, an indigent criminal defendant who wishes to challenge his sentence after pleading guilty (or pursue other possible legal claims) is generally not entitled to appointed counsel, even for a first appeal. Michigan is the only state in the country that denies appointed counsel under these circumstances. The question in this case is whether the Michigan rule violates the Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection under the law.

Update: Dismissed on Dec. 13, 2004 on standing grounds because the Court concluded that the challenge to Michigan’s practice could only be raised by defendants and not by lawyers who are not acting on behalf of specific clients. The ACLU is now representing the petitioner in Halbert v. Michigan, 03-10198, which raises the same issues but without the standing problem identified by the Court.

Legal Documents
> Respondents' Brief in Kowalski v. Tesmer (9/8/2004)


Press
> ACLU Argues in Supreme Court that the Poor Have a Right to Counsel (10/4/2004)


Click to show/hide issues list


BROWSE BY
PREVIOUS TERMS


Latest News
Your Local ACLUcongressional scorecardmultimediaforumspublicationssupport usstorecontact