American Civil Liberties Union

ACLU Freedom Files ACLU Legacy Challenge - See and Hear What Others Have Done

Freedom Files - Season 2
Ideological Exclusion

ACLU NewsfeedsACLU News Feed
ACLU Blog
ACLU Podcasts

Gonzales v. Oregon, 04-623
9/22/2005

RIGHT TO DIE

Reviewing whether the federal government improperly undermined Oregon's Death With Dignity Act by threatening doctors with revocation of their license to prescribe narcotic drugs if they assisted in implementing the Act. DECIDED

Oregon enacted its Death With Dignity Act to assist mentally competent, terminally ill patients in making end-of-life decisions. Reversing an earlier decision by Attorney General Reno, Attorney General Ashcroft then issued a directive stating that any doctor who prescribed narcotic drugs for this purpose risked the loss of his or her federal license. Oregon sued, and the Ninth Circuit ruled that the Attorney General had exceeded his authority under the federal Controlled Substances Act. The ACLU amicus brief supports that ruling, arguing that a contrary conclusion would raise serious constitutional issues about the government's ability to interfere with such personal choices.

Legal Documents
> ACLU Amicus Brief in Gonzales v. Oregon (9/22/2005)


Press
> ACLU Hails Supreme Court Rejection of Attorney General’s Meddling in End-of-Life Decisions (1/17/2006)
> ACLU Urges Supreme Court to Reject Attorney General's Meddling in End-of-Life Decisions (10/5/2005)



Click to show/hide issues list


BROWSE BY
PREVIOUS TERMS


Latest News
Your Local ACLUcongressional scorecardmultimediaforumspublicationssupport usstorecontact