American Civil Liberties Union

ACLU Freedom Files

Freedom Files - Season 2
Ideological Exclusion

ACLU NewsfeedsACLU News Feed
ACLU Blog
ACLU Podcasts

Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood, 04-1144
09/22/2005

REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM

Reviewing the legal standard by which courts consider abortion restrictions and whether laws regulating abortion must protect women's health. DECIDED

SLIDE SHOW
NEWS
Supreme Court Ruling Recognizes Protections for Women's Health (1/18/2006)
Court Urged to Protect Women's Health (11/30/2005)
FEATURES
Answers to Key Questions About Ayotte
C-SPAN covers Ayotte (off-site link)
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood et al. began in 2003 as a challenge to a New Hampshire law restricting teenagers' access to abortion. The law requires doctors to notify a parent at least 48 hours before performing an abortion for a teenager. The law includes no exception for medical emergencies.

In reviewing this case, the Supreme Court will consider two questions: one, must an abortion restriction, not just New Hampshire's, include a medical emergency exception, and two, can doctors and women continue to challenge dangerous abortion restrictions and ask the courts to strike them down before they can harm women?

Legal Documents
> ACLU and PPFA's Supplemental Brief in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood (11/28/2005)
> Brief Amici Curiae for The Center For Adolescent Health & The Law; The National Association of Social Workers; The National Association of Social Workers, New Hampshire Chapter; and Six Other Organizations (9/22/2005)
> ACLU and Planned Parenthood Brief in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood (9/22/2005)
> Brief Amici Curiae of The Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice (9/22/2005)
> Brief for Amici Curiae New Hampshire State Rep. Terie Norelli (9/22/2005)
> Brief for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists as Amici Curiae (9/22/2005)
> Brief of Amici Curiae Center for Reproductive Rights (9/22/2005)
> Brief of Amici Curiae Naral Pro-Choice America Foundation (9/22/2005)
> Brief of Amici Curiae National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (9/22/2005)
> Brief of Organizations Committed to Women's Equality as Amici Curiae (9/22/2005)
> Brief of the Hon. Lynch Governor of New Hampshire as Amicus Curiae (9/22/2005)
> ACLU's brief in opposition to cert in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood (5/23/2005)


Press
> Supreme Court Ruling in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood Recognizes Protections for Women's Health and Safety (1/18/2006)
> Planned Parenthood and ACLU Ask Supreme Court to Protect Women's Health in First Abortion Case Before the Roberts Court (11/30/2005)
> ACLU and Planned Parenthood File Brief in Supreme Court Challenging New Hampshire Abortion Restriction (10/12/2005)
> Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood: A Matter of Women's Health (9/26/2005)
> ACLU and Planned Parenthood Warn That Supreme Court Case on NH Abortion Restriction Could Jeopardize Women's Health and Safety (8/9/2005)
> Federal Appeals Court Strikes Down New Hampshire Law Restricting Teens' Access to Abortion (11/24/2004)


Additional Resources
> Questions and Answers About the Supreme Court's Decision in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, et al. (1/19/2006)
> Highlights from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, et al.'s Friend-of-the-Court Brief in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, et al. (11/30/2005)
> In the Legal Battle over Abortion, Women's Health Care Must Come First (11/30/2005)
> In Times of Medical Crisis, Women Need Doctors Not Judges (11/30/2005)
> Protecting Women's Health is Our Primary Concern (11/30/2005)
> Legal Background: Abortion and the Supreme Court: Ensuring Women's Health (11/28/2005)
> Questions and Answers About the Ayotte Case (11/28/2005)
> Timeline of Important Reproductive Freedom Cases Decided by the Supreme Court (12/1/2003)


Click to show/hide issues list


BROWSE BY
PREVIOUS TERMS


Latest News
Your Local ACLUcongressional scorecardmultimediaforumspublicationssupport usstorecontact