American Civil Liberties Union

ACLU Freedom Files

Freedom Files - Season 2
Ideological Exclusion

ACLU NewsfeedsACLU News Feed
ACLU Blog
ACLU Podcasts

Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America and Gonzales v. Carhart, 05-1382, 05-380
09/27/2006

REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM

Challenge to a federal abortion ban, adopted in 2003, that lacks an exception to preserve a woman's health and is so broadly written that it would prohibit abortions performed as early as 13 weeks into the pregnancy. DECIDED

Three years after the United States Supreme Court struck down a Nebraska abortion ban on the grounds that it lacked a health exception and that its broad language prohibited many common abortion methods, Congress passed a nearly identical ban. Every federal court to review the federal ban has declared it unconstitutional. The Supreme Court will review two of the three legal challenges to the ban. The ACLU filed amicus briefs in each case asking the Court to hold the ban unconstitutional because it endangers women's health and to strike it down in its entirety.

ACLU Legal Director Steve Shapiro talks about the Gonzales case at the 2006 Membership Conference

Legal Documents
> ACLU Amicus Brief in Gonzales v. Carhart (10/13/2006)
> ACLU Amicus Brief in Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America (9/27/2006)


Press
> ACLU and National Abortion Federation Criticize Decision by U.S. Supreme Court Upholding Federal Abortion Ban (4/18/2007)
> U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Argument in Federal Abortion Ban Challenges (11/8/2006)


Additional Resources
> Frequently Asked Questions: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Federal Ban on Abortion Methods (5/23/2007)
> Case Summaries: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Federal Ban on Abortion Methods (5/18/2007)


Click to show/hide issues list


BROWSE BY
PREVIOUS TERMS


Latest News
Your Local ACLUcongressional scorecardmultimediaforumspublicationssupport usstorecontact