Overview of the 2011 Supreme Court Term

 

The 2010 Supreme Court Term defined itself as pro-business, conservative and sensitive to any claim that the government was using its power to censor unpopular speakers or speech.

Supreme Court Ends Pro-Business Term With Important First Amendment Rulings »

Supreme Court Cases

Immigrants' Rights

Arizona v. United States

4/25/2012 - Whether Arizona's effort to enforce federal immigration law by creating its own rules for the interrogation, arrest and detention of undocumented persons is unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause.

Search and Seizure

U.S. v. Jones (Decided)

4/6/2012 - Whether the government needs a search warrant before placing a GPS device on a car and tracking the car's movements for a month.

Employment

Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals (Decided)

3/22/2012 - Whether states can be sued under the "self-care" provision of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) for failing to provide employees with twelve weeks unpaid leave to deal with their own medical needs.

Free Speech

Reichle v. Howards

2/23/2012 - Whether law enforcement officials can ever be sued for money damages when they have probable cause to arrest someone but choose to make the arrest based on the person’s constitutionally protected speech or views.

Criminal Justice

Dorsey v. United States and Hill v. United States

1/30/2012 - Whether the federal Fair Sentencing Act, which reduced the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine from 100:1 to 18:1, applies to defendants who committed their offenses before the Act was passed but were sentenced after the Act’s passage.

Discrimination

Magner v. Gallagher (Dismissed)

1/27/2012 - Whether housing policies that have a disproportionate impact on racial minorities and women violate the anti-discrimination provision of the federal Fair Housing Act.

Free Speech

U.S. v. Alvarez

1/20/2012 - Whether the government can make it a crime to intentionally lie about receiving a military honor, regardless of the circumstances in which the statement is made.

Health Care

Dep't of Health and Human Services v. Florida

1/13/2012 - Whether the minimum coverage provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, also known as the individual mandate, is constitutional.

Free Speech

FCC v. Fox Television

11/10/2011 - Whether the FCC's censorship of "indecent" speech on broadcast radio and television is unconstitutional?

Criminal Justice

Messerschmidt v. Millender (Decided)

10/21/2011 - Whether a police officer can be held liable for executing a search warrant when it is objectively unreasonable to believe that the warrant is supported by probable cause.

Free Speech

Golan v. Holder (Decided)

10/7/2011 - Whether the government may extend copyright protection to expressive material — including books, music, and movies — that was previously available in the public domain.

Private Prisons

Minneci v. Pollard (Decided)

9/19/2011 - Whether private prison officials can be sued for violating the constitutional rights of federal prisoners?

Free Speech

Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories (Decided)

9/8/2011 - Whether the challenged patents in this case violate both patent law and the First Amendment because they reach abstract ideas and pure thought.

Access to Justice

Douglas v. Independent Living Center (Decided)

8/10/2011 - Whether private individuals may raise a claim that California has failed to comply with federal Medicaid requirements by suing directly under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution.

Discrimination, Religious Freedom

Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Decided)

8/9/2011 - Whether the Americans with Disabilities Act may be constitutionally applied to a religious school's retaliatory firing of a teacher terminated for reasons unrelated to religion.

Criminal Justice

Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye (Decided)

7/22/2011 - Whether a criminal defendant who forgoes a plea bargain because of ineffective assistance of counsel is entitled to relief if he subsequently receives a longer sentence after conviction than the prosecutor initially offered.

Search and Seizure

Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington (Decided)

6/27/2011 - Whether a jail policy of strip searching every new detainee violates the Fourth Amendment.

Death Penalty

Maples v. Thomas (Decided)

5/25/2011 - Whether the defendant’s failure to file a timely appeal in state court should bar all subsequent federal court review of his death sentence when the reason for the missed deadline was that Alabama officials made no effort to inform him of an adverse decision from the state courts after it was returned unopened by his lawyers' former law firm.

Statistics image