ACLU of Michigan Files Federal Lawsuit Challenging Primary Election Law (1/11/2008)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: media@aclu.org
DETROIT - The American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan announced today a
federal lawsuit challenging the new primary law that requires the Michigan
Secretary of State to provide party preference declarations solely to the two
major political parties of the State. The law, passed in August of 2007,
makes it a misdemeanor for others, including political parties, journalists,
academics or historians, to have access or use the lists. The ACLU filed the
lawsuit on behalf of the Green Party of Michigan, Libertarian Party of Michigan,
the Reform Party of Michigan, the Metro Times and Winning Strategies, a
political consulting firm.
“It is not our intention to stop the primary,” said Kary L. Moss, ACLU of
Michigan Executive Director. “Instead, it is our contention that the state
cannot lawfully limit access to this information to the two major political
parties. The consequence of this law is to exclude individuals and parties
from meaningful participation in the political process.”
Michigan law does not require voters to register by party and therefore voter
party preference information is valuable to political parties, individual
candidates, citizen groups supporting or opposing ballot proposals, political
consultants, news media, researchers, other specialized groups and members of
the public. The law mandates that anyone other than the two parties who "uses" a
"secret" record could be issued a 93-day, $1,000 misdemeanor.
“The main problem with this statue is that it gives valuable political
resources to the two major parties to use for almost any purpose while making it
a crime for anyone else in the state to use or acquire this information,” said
Thomas F. Wieder, ACLU of Michigan Cooperating Attorney.
The lawsuit charges that the new law violates the Equal Protection Clause of
the Fourteenth Amendment by providing the information to the two major political
parties of the State while denying access to that information to everyone else.
The lawsuit claims that “there is no compelling state interest that would
justify providing this valuable party preference information solely to the two
major political parties.”
In addition, the plaintiffs claim that the law violates the First Amendment
and the Michigan Constitution by preventing the Metro Times and other news media
from reporting and commenting upon matters of public interest that relate to
voter party preference information.
The lawsuit asks the U.S. District Court in Detroit to declare the law
unconstitutional and permanently prohibit the Secretary of State from carrying
out the provisions of the law.
The plaintiffs are represented by Wieder, Moss, ACLU of Michigan Legal
Director Michael J. Steinberg and ACLU of Michigan Cooperating Attorney Stephen
F. Wasinger.
To read the Complaint, visit: http://aclumich.org/pdf/primarycomplaint.pdf
|