Florida Clemency Reform Not All It’s Cracked Up to Be, Says ACLU (4/5/2007)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: media@aclu.org
New Rules Fall Short of Comprehensive Solution to Voting Rights Crisis
TALLAHASSEE, FL - The American Civil Liberties Union expressed disappointment
with today’s announcement by Governor Charlie Crist and the Board of Executive
Clemency regarding Florida's new rules for restoration of civil and voting
rights. Although this first step toward comprehensive reform represents
incremental progress, said the ACLU, the new rules fall far short of fixing
Florida’s civil and voting rights crisis.
“This plan is a good first step but there is much work left to be done,” said
Howard Simon, Executive Director of the ACLU of Florida. “There are hundreds of
thousands of people in Florida - more than any other state - who have had their
fundamental civil or voting rights taken away by the state based on a Civil War
Reconstruction-era scheme to deprive as many people as possible of their right
to vote. The Board of Executive Clemency’s plan does nothing to address the
rights of these citizens. Florida is still dealing with the consequences of the
Civil War and the unfinished business of the civil rights movement.”
The rules are crucially ambiguous, said the ACLU, especially as to whether
individuals released years and decades ago still face the burden of collecting
their records and applying for the restoration of civil and voting rights. The
ACLU called for a paperless and immediate automatic restoration process for all
ex-offenders who have completed the non-monetary terms of their sentence.
An additional amendment to the rules passed at today’s meeting appears to
require those arrested or convicted a second time to wait an additional ten
years to re-apply to have their rights restored. This is yet another barrier
intended to disenfranchise as many people as possible, said the ACLU.
“The new rules are needlessly complex and will only confuse and deter
potential applicants, and also confound corrections and elections officials. The
burdens of paperwork and hearings will continue to impede voting,” said Laleh
Ispahani, Senior Policy Counsel for the national ACLU. “Complicated schemes such
as this one have proven unworkable in other states. One such state, Maryland,
overhauled its formerly complex policy just last month.”
The vast majority of ex-offenders are the nearly one million citizens who
have already been released, completed their sentences and are working to support
their families in Florida. These disenfranchised citizens receive fewer
reprieves under the new rules. The ACLU said an executive order issued by the
governor with the support of at least two cabinet members could immediately and
automatically restore rights to these citizens.
Reaching this large population and educating them on the new rules will be a
daunting task. A system that would proactively benefit the majority of the
disenfranchised should be automatic, immediate and paperless, said the ACLU, not
require a tedious, bureaucratic paperwork process and waiting period to receive
a certificate of restoration.
“The fact remains that the new rules are unnecessarily ambiguous and will
lead to more confusion and a greater backlog of applications,” said Muslima
Lewis, Director of the ACLU of Florida’s Racial Justice and Voting Rights
Project, a Florida Rights Restoration Coalition (FRRC) member organization.
“Restitution remains an often insurmountable barrier that prevents ex-offenders
that are law-abiding citizens from regaining their fundamental right to vote,
and the ability to obtain dozens of occupational licenses.”
The new rules also continue to perpetuate payment of restitution as a
precondition before rights can be restored. The ACLU argeed that restitution
should be paid but said it should not be required in advance of rights
restoration. Many people are unable to work because there are dozens of
state-issued occupational licenses, such as nursing, that cannot be obtained
until a person’s rights have been restored.
|