Washington State Supreme Court Says Endorsements by Talk Show Hosts Are Not Campaign Contributions (4/26/2007)
Decision Consistent with ACLU Position FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: media@aclu.org
SEATTLE - The Washington Supreme Court today decided unanimously that endorsements
of ballot issues by radio talk show hosts should not be treated as campaign
contributions. The ACLU of Washington submitted a friend-of-the-court brief
in the case backing the free speech rights of the talk show hosts in the case.
"Free discussion of political issues in the media is an essential part of
the democratic process. The government should not limit robust debate on controversial
issues during an election campaign," said ACLU cooperating attorney Mike Kipling.
Ruling today in San Juan County v. No New Gas Tax ,
the Washington State Supreme Court reversed a lower court finding that radio
broadcasts by KVI-AM hosts Kirby Wilbur and John Carlson were "in-kind" political
contributions to a political campaign.
The ACLU filed its amicus brief in support of the No New Gas Tax committee,
which sponsored Initiative 912 in 2005 to repeal gas taxes for transportation
improvements. The committee was sued by San Juan County and the cities of Kent
, Auburn and Seattle . They argued that KVI-AM radio hosts Kirby Wilbur and
John Carlson made "in-kind" campaign contributions when they endorsed the initiative
and requested donations on the air. The Thurston Superior Court agreed, ordering
the committee to disclose anonymous donations and to put a monetary value on
the KVI broadcasts, estimated at $20,000.
In its brief, the ACLU said that talk radio shows are not the same as paid
advertisements and cannot be treated as campaign contributions because that
would violate First Amendment protections for free speech. The ACLU said that
doing so would make broadcasters and other media hesitant to talk about political
issues before an election out of fear that the state would force them to disclose
reports and talk shows as political contributions. Furthermore, the ACLU said
that if speech on the radio were a campaign contribution, it could be banned
outright in the weeks immediately before the election under the state's campaign
finance laws.
Agreeing with the ACLU, the Washington State Supreme Court concluded that
statements by radio personalities as part of their regularly scheduled broadcasts
are not "contributions" within the meaning of Washington's campaign finance
laws.
The ACLU brief was written by cooperating attorney Mike Kipling of Kipling
Law Group and ACLU staff attorney Aaron Caplan.
|