Letter Opposing Senator Mitch McConnell's Photo ID for Voting Amendment to the Immigration Bill (5/25/2007)
Dear Senator:
Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
has proposed Amendment No. 1170 to S. 1348, which may be voted on by the full
Senate after recess. On behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU), and its hundreds of thousands of members, activists, and fifty-three
affiliates nationwide, we write to urge you to oppose this amendment.
Amendment 1170 would require voters to present a government-issued photo
ID in order to vote in federal elections. This requirement imposes an
unnecessary and undue burden on the exercise of the fundamental right to vote
for millions of Americans who are eligible, registered, and qualified to
vote.
Photo identification
requirements amount to a poll tax. As with the other methods of
disfranchisement in American history, such as literacy tests and poll taxes, the
photo identification requirement would present substantial barriers to voting
and have a chilling effect on voter participation. As a significant number of racial and
ethnic minority voters, voters with disabilities, rural and Native voters, the homeless, the
elderly, and low-income people do not have photo identification nor the
financial means to acquire it, the burden of this requirement would fall
disproportionately and unfairly upon them. Requiring voters to purchase
photo identification, or the supporting documents needed to obtain a photo ID,
would be tantamount to requiring them to pay a poll tax, and therefore be
suspect under the Voting Rights Act.[1] While the cost of
identification documents may seem negligible to some, it represents a
significant cost to many Americans.
No citizen should have to pay to vote.
Identification requirements
pose a substantial hardship for some citizens. Attempts to cover the cost of ID for
voters who cannot afford them does not cure the disproportionate burden such a
requirement would have on these voters. Certainly, our most cherished civil
right should never depend on annual appropriations decisions. But even if the IDs themselves are
“free,” the documents required to get an ID are not. While Amendment 1170 makes a feeble
attempt to cover the costs for the photo ID, there are many practical
considerations that are overlooked, which pose a significant hardship for voters
– such as lost wages, travel time, transportation expenses, locations of photo
ID facilities, hours of operation, and costs for the back-up documentation
necessary to receive a photo ID.
Additionally, many U.S. citizens
either do not have or cannot easily access the back-up documents that prove
their identity such as a passport or birth certificate. It was not uncommon in many parts of the
country for children to born at home without an official birth
certificate. In such instances, these citizens may be unable to vote
because they would be unable to produce the requisite documentation for a photo
ID.
Photo ID laws will
disfranchise millions of citizens.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has consistently raised objections to
imposing photo identification as a prerequisite for voting because such
requirements are likely to have an adverse impact on black voters and will
lessen their political participation. In 1994, DOJ found that African
Americans in Louisiana were four to five times less likely than whites to have
driver’s licenses or other picture identification cards.[2] In addition, the Federal Elections
Commission noted in its 1997 report to Congress that photo identification
entails major expenses, both initially and in maintenance, and presents an undue
and potentially discriminatory burden on citizens in exercising their basic
right to vote.[3] Finally, a recent New York Times article
noted that imposition of identification requirements on voters had reduced
turnout in the 2004 election by about 3%, but disproportionately reduced turnout
for minorities by two to three times as much.[4]
Photo ID requirements build in
too much discretion and uncertainty into the voting process. These requirements would build in an
enormous amount of discretion into the balloting process, thus creating
opportunities for discrimination at the polls against racial, ethnic, and
language minority voters. Deciding
whether a voter matches the photo in an ID card is a very subjective process –
one that is easily prone to mistake or much worse. In addition, if an ID does not contain
the voter’s current address or name, which is true of countless Americans who
move or marry, he or she will likely be turned away from the polls. A photo ID amendment would only serve to
distort election results by removing countless eligible voters from the process.
The McConnell amendment is
overreaching and amounts to a solution in search of a problem. While
supporters of ID requirements argue that it is necessary to require photo IDs in
order to combat efforts to skew elections, recent evidence clearly establishes that there is
virtually no evidence of any organized voter fraud.[5] While there are incidences of election misconduct, including, for
example, improper purges of voters and distributing false information about when
and where to vote, none of these issues are addressed or can be resolved
by a photo ID requirement.
The right to vote, and to have
your vote counted, is the most important civil right of all. Congress should be in the business of
encouraging full participation of our citizenry, not developing ways to limit
the right to vote. Proposals
like the McConnell amendment are one of the greatest threats to fair and equal
voting rights today. For the
reasons indicated above, we urge you to oppose Amendment 1170 on S.
1348.
Sincerely, Caroline Fredrickson Director
Deborah J. Vagins
Policy Counsel for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties
[1] See 42
U.S.C §1973 et seq.
[2] Letter from Deval
L. Patrick, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division of the U.S.
Department of Justice, to Sheri Morris, Assistant Attorney General for the State
of Louisiana (Nov. 21, 1994).
[3] Letter from L.
Anthony Sutin, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Department of Justice to
Congress on amendments to the Bi-partisan Campaign Integrity Act of
1997.
[4] Christopher Drew,
Lower Voter Turnout Is Seen in States That Require ID, New York Times, Feb. 21, 2007, at
A16.
[5] Eric Lipton and
Ian Urbina, In 5-Year Effort, Scant Evidence of Voter Fraud, New York Times, Apr. 12, 2007, at
A1.
|