ACLU Asks Justice Department to Monitor Election Day in Virginia (10/20/2006)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: media@aclu.orgCivil Liberties Group Cites Suppression of Minority Voters in Chesterfield
County CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA -- Citing a pattern of voter suppression, the
American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia today asked the U.S. Department of
Justice to send federal election observers to Chesterfield County on Election
Day, November 7, 2006.
In a letter to John Tanner, chief of the Justice Department’s voting rights
section, ACLU of Virginia Executive Director Kent Willis cites four incidents
over the last two years that, if repeated, could have an adverse impact on
minority voters.
“Chesterfield seems to be Virginia’s number one trouble spot for irregular
voting procedures,” said Willis. “Some, like the bizarre posting of armed
guards at polling places two years ago, seem intentionally designed to
intimidate minority voters. Others, like telling voters standing in line that
they must have identification to vote, are simply more likely to have a negative
impact on minority voters than others. Either way, the Justice Department
ought to be present on Election Day in Chesterfield to ensure that racially fair
procedures are in place.”
In addition to the 2004 incidents involving armed guards and misinforming
voters that they must have identification, Willis also cites Registrar Lawrence
C. Haake III’s refusal last year to count provisional ballots submitted by
persons who had registered on time but whose applications were not processed in
a timely manner, as well as an incident reported in the Richmond Times-Dispatch
today in which Haake refused to issue an absentee ballot to a registered voter
because the voter would not give out his Social Security Number.
“I cannot say with certainty that any of these incidents will repeat
themselves in Chesterfield County on Election Day 2006,” Willis wrote.
“Cumulatively, however, they indicate a jurisdiction that is generally hostile
to fair voting practices and specifically likely to restrict voting procedures
in a manner that disproportionately impacts minority voters.”
The full text of Willis’s letter appears below:
ACLU of Virginia October 20, 2006
John Tanner, Chief of the Voting Rights Section Civil Rights Division,
U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, D.C.
20530
RE: Request for Federal Observers in Chesterfield, Virginia, on Election Day
2006
Dear Mr. Tanner,
I am writing to request that the U.S. Department of Justice send federal
election observers to Chesterfield County on Election Day, November 7,
2006. My request stems from several recent incidents in Chesterfield
indicating that officials there may implement voting procedures that will have
an adverse impact on minority voters.
The incidents are as follows:
1) Posting of Armed Guards at Polling Places
In October 2004, Registrar Lawrence C. Haake III announced plans to place
armed guards at every polling precinct in Chesterfield County on Election Day.
Concerned that the armed guards -- a certain reminder of tactics used to prevent
African-Americans from voting in the past -- would intimidate some minority
voters, the ACLU of Virginia, the Virginia State Conference NAACP, the Virginia
Muslim Coalition, and State Board of Elections objected to the plan. When
Mr. Haake persisted, the U.S. Department of Justice sent federal observers to
Chesterfield County on Election Day.
2) Misinforming Voters That They Must Be Carrying Identification
On Election Day, November 2, 2004, the ACLU of Virginia received complaints
that poll workers in Chesterfield were advising voters that that they must be
carrying identification in order to cast a ballot. This is contrary to
Virginia law, which only requires that voters without identification sign an
affirmation of identity before voting. Mr. Haake agreed to instruct poll
workers not to require identification.
3) Refusing to Count Provisional Ballots Cast by Persons Who Registered
On Time
Before the June 2005 primary elections, Mr. Haake announced that he would not
count the provisional ballots of voters who had submitted registration
applications at DMV or other state offices prior to the deadline for
registration, but whose applications had not been forwarded to the Registrar in
a timely manner. He only backed off after the ACLU of Virginia and the NAACP
threatened to file a lawsuit. 4) Demanding Social Security Numbers
before Issuing Absentee Ballots
Today, the Richmond Times-Dispatch reports that Mr. Haake turned down a
request for an absentee ballot from a voter who refused to give the Registrar
his Social Security Number. The State Board of Elections has warned Mr.
Haake that registered voters cannot be made to reveal their Social Security
Numbers as a condition of voting.
I cannot say with certainty that any of these incidents will repeat
themselves in Chesterfield on Election Day 2006. Cumulatively, however,
they indicate a jurisdiction that is generally hostile to fair voting practices
and specifically likely to restrict voting procedures in a manner that
disproportionately impacts minority voters.
Again, I ask that you plan to send election observers to Chesterfield County,
as you did in 2004. If you have any questions or would like additional
information, please feel free to contact me at (804) 644-8080.
Sincerely, Kent
Willis Executive Director
cc: Laughlin McDonald, Director, ACLU Voting Rights Project
|