American Civil Liberties Union

Women's Rights:
The ACLU's Women's Rights Project was co-founded in 1972 by Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Through litigation, community outreach, advocacy and public education, WRP empowers poor women, women of color and immigrant women who have been victimized by gender bias and face pervasive barriers to equality. Learn more about the WRP.


ACLU Membership Conference

Freedom Files - Season 2
Ideological Exclusion

ACLU NewsfeedsACLU News Feed
ACLU Blog
ACLU Podcasts

Womens Rights : Legal Documents

Jones v. Hayman - Certification of Kathleen Jones (04/10/2008)

Jones v. Hayman - Certification of Helen Ewell (04/10/2008)

Open Records Request - ACLU of Georgia Greene County School District (04/07/2008)

Jones v. Hayman - Plaintiffs' Brief in Support of Motion for Sanctions (03/26/2008)

Merits Brief in Gonzales v. USA (03/25/2008)

Merits Brief Exhibits in Gonzales v. USA (03/25/2008)

Sabbithi, et al. v. Al Saleh, et al. - Letter from Judge Sullivan to State Department (03/20/2008)
On March 20, 2008 Judge Emmet Sullivan wrote to the State Department with regard to the lawsuit pending in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Sabbithi, et al. v. Al Saleh, et al., requesting that the State Department take a position on the ACLU's argument that trafficking constitutes a commercial activity. Judge Sullivan noted that this case presents a different legal challenge to diplomatic immunity than presented in previous cases. In light of his letter to the State Department, the judge also denied the diplomats’ motion to dismiss the case on the basis of diplomatic immunity.

J.K. v. Arizona Board of Regents - Amicus Brief (03/03/2008)
On March 3, 2008, the ACLU Women’s Rights Project, joined by the ACLU of Arizona and six other leading women’s advocacy organizations, filed a brief as friends of the court in J.K. v. Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of a student who was raped in her dorm room by an Arizona State University (“ASU”) football player. The brief argues to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona that ASU is liable under Title IX for the rape and for the related discrimination suffered by the plaintiff, because ASU knew that the football player in question was a serial sexual harasser. ASU had expelled the harasser for severe sexual harassment of multiple women at ASU over the summer, and then weeks later arranged to re-admit him – with no supervision -- to ASU and to the ASU dorms where he raped the plaintiff a few months later.

Lewis v. North End Village - Settlement Order (02/26/2008)

Lewis v. North End Village - Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, and Stalking Policy (02/26/2008)

Lewis v. North End Village - Disclosure to Housing Applicants (02/26/2008)

Lewis v. North End Village - Request for Relocation and Early Lease Termination Form (02/26/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next >
Click to show/hide issues list
Your Local ACLUcongressional scorecardmultimediaforumspublicationssupport usstorecontact