Because freedom can't protect itself
Whalen v Roe, must show compeling intrest
Thank you for doing this. In Utah a law enforcement officer does not even need a subpoena for such access. Recently an officer has been charged with using this information to steal medication from people under the guise of a 'pill check'. (http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=23707614). Utah might be a better place to start because this data has absolutely zero protections.
You clearly don't get it. It is really important that the DEA have these records. That important public policy makes it constitutional. Otherwise, someone might be using prescription drugs for recreational purposes. What are your "civil liberties" compared to the scourge of illicit drug use?
Until the Supreme Court reverses Gonzales v. Raich (2005) there is a "drug war exception" to the Constitution.
I would like to see this overturned but it will be a huge challenge.
Get breaking news on issues you care about
Help fight for our rights. Donate to the ACLU.
Sign up for the ACLU Action newsletter.
Chip in to help protect all of our rights and liberties.
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor, New York NY 10004
This is the website of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about these two components of the ACLU.