Blog of Rights

  • Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page

Run for President if You Must, But Don't Take My DNA!

By Noam Biale at 6:59pm
Ears were pricked to Michael Bloomberg's State of the City speech last night for any hint that the New York City mayor might throw his hat into the Presidential primary ring. No change in the tea leaves yet, but Bloomberg did say something that ought to set off alarms for anyone who values their privacy: The Mayor announced that he will push the legislature in Albany to expand the state's criminal DNA databank to include people who have not been convicted of any crime, but merely arrested. Most of us are familiar with the utility of DNA testing to catch criminals, as seen repeatedly on CSI, and to exonerate the innocent. But a plan like Bloomberg's not only turns the bedrock legal principle of "innocent until proven guilty" on its head, it's unlikely to make our streets any safer. Readers of this blog don't need to be convinced of the sensitivity of genetic information - the privacy of our genetic code is critical lest that information fall into the hands of insurance companies who might deny coverage, or employers who might deny a job based on some real or perceived genetic disease. But the as-yet-untold story of DNA databanks is that when you expand them beyond their utility, they not only stop working well to solve crimes, they often begin to work against that purpose. This is because massive expansions of these databanks tend to increase already existing backlogs, which overwhelm crime labs and lead to shoddy analysis. Backlogs, negligence, and outright malicious tampering at the Houston Crime Lab led to hundreds of cases being called into question based on their reliance on tainted evidence. As a result, one innocent man, Josiah Sutton, served four years in prison for a rape he did not commit. We ought to be using DNA evidence to catch perpetrators of rape and murder - the types of crimes where DNA evidence is most often found. Under Bloomberg's plan, the NYPD could take (and permanently store) DNA from anyone trespassing, carrying an open container or possessing a dime bag of pot. Reefer Madness notwithstanding, marijuana possession has never been shown to be a precursor to rape and murder. Speaking of marijuana, CUNY Sociologist Harry Levine has done a fascinating study on who would actually end up in Bloomberg's DNA databank. Levine studied arrest rates for marijuana possession in New York City from 1997 to 2006. What he found during that time was that although numerous studies have shown that whites tend to smoke marijuana at about twice the rate of minorities, blacks and Latinos are arrested for possession in New York City more than eight times as often as whites. In addition, the sheer number of these arrests is stunning: out of the 360,000 people arrested or jailed in that 9-year period, 86 percent of them belonged to minority groups. So what is Mayor Bloomberg really proposing here? DNA databanks at best provide diminishing returns to crime solving, so what would in effect be created is a tool for genetic surveillance - one that targets primarily minority communities who will be permanent suspects for any and all future crimes. That's not something Americans want our leaders, be they mayors or presidents, pursuing, especially if it won't make us safer. Stay tuned for updates on the NYCLU and ACLU's efforts to stop Bloomberg's databank expansion.

Bird Flu and Civil Liberties

By Noam Biale at 10:35am
The emergence of Avian Flu overseas and high profile cases of individuals with drug resistant TB last year alerted the American public to the potential for a large-scale pandemic of influenza or some other infectious disease in the near future. The…

Intelligence on Steroids

By Noam Biale at 12:01pm
If the mantra of post-9/11 intelligence gathering is “to find a needle in a haystack, just make the haystack bigger,” we now present the Barry Bonds of haystacks. Today, we released a report on Fusion Centers - state, local, and regional…

Deja Vu, Plus 20,000 New Records

By Noam Biale at 7:07pm
Hanging around Capitol Hill tends to induce a feeling of déjà vu. The House Homeland Security Committee held a hearing today on the Terrorist Screening Center (TSC) Watch List - a rerun of last month's hearing in the Senate on the same…

We Must Try Every Stupid Idea at Least Twice!

By Noam Biale at 1:38pm
The Indianapolis Star reports today that next week, the Indiana state Bureau of Motor Vehicles will begin sending out "No Match" letters to Hoosiers with discrepancies in their records. The letters will go out to anyone whose license information…

Eliot Spitzer: From Steamroller to Steamrolled

By Noam Biale at 11:21am
When Eliot Spitzer was inaugurated as Governor of New York in January, he vowed to transform the culture of Albany where, notoriously, state policy decisions are made by "three men in a room." Two men in a room.The former Attorney General, who had…

Who's Watching the Watch List?

By Noam Biale at 3:51pm
The good folks at the FBI's Terrorism Screening Center are doing a bang-up job: they keep identifying more and more terrorists among us. Don't believe me? Just look at the number of records the TSC has added to the terrorist watch list: From 158,374…

Who Loves Real ID? AOL, Microsoft and Yahoo Do.

By Noam Biale at 9:45am
The federal Real ID Act doesn't have many friends these days. Eighteen states have passed legislation rejecting the law, Congress has refused to put any money into implementing it, and just this week New York Gov. Elliot Spitzer announced he, not the…
  • Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page
Statistics image