Donald Trump’s Talk to Police Officers Was Police-State Authoritarianism Distilled to Its Essence

…and when you see these thugs being thrown into the back of a paddy wagon — you just see them thrown in, rough — I said, please don’t be too nice. (Laughter.) Like when you guys put somebody in the car and you’re protecting their head, you know, the way you put their hand over? Like, don’t hit their head and they’ve just killed somebody — don’t hit their head. I said, you can take the hand away, okay? (Laughter and applause.)

— Donald Trump speaking to police officers on Friday, July 28.

Freddie Gray ended up dead after the kind of treatment described above. And despite his death, last Friday Donald Trump made sure that police officers around America knew that if they use illegal, unnecessary force when arresting suspects, he will have their backs. He then doubled down by promising to repeal anti-police laws that don’t exist. This is the man who said he could kill someone on Fifth Avenue in New York, and it would not make any difference to his supporters. Apparently, he believes he can make up laws and then pretend to repeal them, and no one will notice.

Was he joking?

I don’t think so. Not when his remedy for a crime is a return to unconstitutional, ineffective policies like “stop and frisk” practices. Not when his attorney general proposes a return to policies that will produce the same racially biased results, with overly long sentences, that do nothing to make us safer. Trump’s delusional view of the world tells people whose communities have already suffered and paid a heavy price for unnecessary police violence that more of the same is coming. Why wait for the courts to mete out punishment when we can get a little payback on the street?

In Trump’s world when someone is arrested, officers should not hesitate to inflict some pain — and if that attitude makes encounters between police and the public more violent and dangerous, so be it. If more people — innocent or guilty — are injured or killed, so be it. If culture starts at the top, Trump’s promise to back officers who use unnecessary force is extremely dangerous. This is precisely the kind of rhetoric and viewpoint that led to the behavior of Chicago police officers who were indicted in June for conspiracy for “backing up” Officer Jason Van Dyke by lying about the killing of Laquan McDonald.

In showing support for the police, Trump quickly turned to fantasy and fiction. He went from telling police not to worry about the use of illegal force to making up laws that don’t exist and promising to get rid of them.

"…the laws are so horrendously stacked against us, because for years and years they’ve been made to protect the criminal. Totally made to protect the criminal, not the officers. If you do something wrong, you’re in more jeopardy than they are. These laws are stacked against you. We’re changing those laws.”

No such laws exist, and none were passed during the Obama administration. Police kill unarmed Americans with virtual immunity because the laws dealing with the police’s use of deadly force are some of the strongest, pro-law enforcement laws in the country. In 2015, for example, the Guardian reported that police in America killed 1,146 people. Fewer than 20 officers were prosecuted. Ask the families of Terence Crutcher and Philando Castile if the laws are stacked against police officers. And while both families were paid millions of dollars — seeming to suggest that the officers who killed Crutcher and Castile were “wrong” — the officers were protected.

The trip into fantasy land did not stop there. At the Friday event, Trump described a conversation with a Chicago police officer about how long it would take to “straighten out the problem” in Chicago. He said it ended like this:

“How long would it take you to straighten out this problem?” He said, “If you gave me the authority, a couple of days.” (Laughter.) I really mean it. I said, “You really think so?” He said, “A couple of days. We know all the bad ones. We know them all.” And he said, the officers — you guys, you know all the bad ones in your area. You know them by their names. He said, “We know them all. A couple of days.”

This is typical Trump. He presents simplistic solutions to complicated problems with no thought or judgment. We can solve all crime problems by getting tough and arresting all the bad guys in a couple of days, slamming their heads into police cars as they are taken into custody. This sounds like the plot to a bad Western movie. It is certainly not sane criminal justice policy. Culture and acceptable behavior start at the top, and this kind of message from this administration is not new. Trump’s comments are completely consistent with the Justice Department’s approach to criminal justice — a return to failed policies of the past and support police behaving in excessive and unconstitutional ways.

Some may say that Trump was only talking about using violence against gang members — he referred to them as animals. Here are two problems with this analysis. First, the rule of law forbids the use of unnecessary violence, even against people who are guilty of a crime. Second, the police are not now and never have been and never will be perfect. So innocent “suspects” will get the same treatment. And we know which communities will pay the price for unnecessary police violence.

We have been down this road before, and opposition to Trump’s view is not about defending horrible behavior. If gang members are animals, what about gang affiliates? Or people suspected of being gang members or affiliates? Or innocent Black and Latino males who live in the same neighborhood as gang members. Once the unnecessary violence starts, it is impossible to restrict it to any one group of suspects.

And once unnecessary violence is acceptable, does it stop at banging someone’s head against a police car? How about doing it twice? Or a couple of blows from a nightstick? Or a couple thousand volts from a taser? Eric Garner got choked to death over selling loose cigarettes. The culture Trump promotes will lead to more Eric Garners, Philando Castiles, Sandra Blands.

Some police departments have repudiated Trump’s remarks — and every law enforcement agency in the country should. Still, what’s really scary is that some number of the officers present at the Friday event were laughing and applauding.

Add a comment (17)
Read the Terms of Use

Kristin Brackett

The most wrongdoing pervaded regions in the USA are all Democrat fortresses, how progressive. Here is a Link: http://www.assignmentlabs.co.uk/buy-assignment/

Rebecca H.

At the end of the day, although Trump attempted to "clean up " his statements, basically he was giving the "quietest,loudes, highly publicized permission slips to thousands, of already angry; nervous; trigger happy; scared officers to collar SUSPECTS in whatever way they'd like. This is sad because we have Just started get understanding and respect for how and why we feel the way we do. Any soo many of All colors, cultures, and creeds are just starting to put a slight dent in moving forward as Americans, not individuals. So, if the police officers take his words to heart, we're almost back to square one. That's soo sad, especially if we, THE
ENTIRE AMERICAN FAMILY doesn't stick together and continue to move forward and seek peace and unity as a whole. Don't allow the idiosyncrasies distrust our goals!!

Anonymous

Why won't the ACLU speak out and try to help Julian Assange? He appears to be the most censured individual in the world. More and more the ACLU seems to be a propaganda arm of the 6 mega-media corporations, as evidenced by their continuing smear of our President.

Anonymous

Ok your allowed to vent and your state your opinion . I support Good Cops and that is what we need . Bad people are bad and unfortunately there are some in law enforcement who make mistakes but don't throw baby out with bath water. Don't let one bad apple spoil the bunch . Also since this such an important issue the President should qualify what he says and means, to have respectability. I think he supports our Brave , Courageous Law Officers and they have Important Difficult Occupation that I sure couldn't do. He just doesn't know how to say it .

Anonymous

Two wrongs don't make it right . Bad people are just bad . Bad policing is wrong but Generally policing is a necessary good. A few bad apples don't spoil the whole bunch . Good Police will
Hopefully see to it the bad ones leave and go do something else .

Mary

We are living in a police state now.

Anonymous

Excellent article

Pages

Sign Up for Breaking News