The House Tells Sessions’ Justice Department It Will Not Stand for Civil Asset Forfeiture

The U.S. House sent a strong message of rebuke to Attorney General Jeff Sessions on civil asset forfeiture last night. The House adopted three amendments offered to an appropriations bill that prohibit the Department of Justice from using funds to increase certain federal and local forfeiture practices.

Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) summed up the problem with civil asset forfeiture in one sentence. “It is an unconstitutional practice that is used to violate the due process rights of innocent people,” he said from the House floor.

This bipartisan showing was in response to Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ July announcement to expand the use of civil forfeiture. Sessions’ action was a reversal of a 2015 Attorney General Eric Holder policy that prevented local law enforcement from using federal forfeiture laws to circumvent more restrictive state forfeiture laws.

The House votes also signaled that Congress remains committed to comprehensive civil forfeiture reform.

The ACLU joined a diverse set of partners in support of these amendments. Our organizations believe that the “civil forfeiture system undermines property rights and is fundamentally unjust.” The ACLU is particularly concerned with civil forfeitures’ impact on poor people and people of color. As Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) said on the House floor yesterday, “Forfeiture efforts tend to target poor neighborhoods” and that forfeiture “does not discriminate between the innocent and the guilty.”

The House votes also signaled that Congress remains committed to comprehensive civil forfeiture reform. Like Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) said, “This amendment is a starting point, and we can’t stop here.” The ACLU will continue its work with members on both sides of the aisle to advance legislation like the Fifth Amendment Integrity Restoration (FAIR) Act and the DUE PROCESS Act. These bills would provide important procedural protections for those who want their day in court to challenge forfeitures, and the FAIR Act would address the profit incentive that is driving forfeiture.     

Over on the Senate side, civil forfeiture reformers, like Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), also had a bone to pick with the practice. Yesterday, Grassley wrote Sessions expressing outrage with the U.S. Marshals’ misuse of forfeiture funds.  The marshals have used forfeiture funds to furnish a Texas facility with “high-end granite countertops and expensive custom artwork” despite a prohibition of such purchases with forfeiture funds. Forfeiture funds “should not be treated as a slush fund for extravagances,” Grassley said.     

And Grassley’s letter coincides with other forfeiture abuses coming to light in recent weeks. Over the weekend, a U.C. Berkley police officer seized $60 from a hot dog vendor for not having the appropriate permits. Last week, we learned that a Tennessee Department of Safety & Homeland Security improperly spent over $100,000 in forfeiture funds on catering and banquet tickets. Today the Institute for Justice announced it is suing U.S. Customs and Border Protection for the indefinite detention of a truck seized at a border crossing. 

Enough is enough, so we are excited that the Congress has taken action this week to rein in civil forfeiture. We need to make sure that the Senate follows the House’s lead and keeps the forfeiture amendments in any final spending bill.

Congress needs to hear from you.

During last night’s debate, Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.) stated action must be taken when “the liberals and the conservatives come together and agree on libertarian principles.”

We couldn’t agree more.          

View comments (27)
Read the Terms of Use


great post man and yes you are right

Gift Cards

Get free NordStrom Gift Card


Yes, and in one case the cash generated by such seizures is being used to develop an "extrajurisdictional strike force" I wonder what THEY will do.....

Joel Potasznik

In September of 2015 I was falsely accused of criminal conspiracy, and property (50 acres and a building) I have owned in Dallas, Texas, for over twenty years was seized by county officials with no notice or warning. Tenants were given three hours to vacate the premises. To this date (over two years later), neither I nor any of the tenants have been ticketed, cited, charged or indicted for any offense. I remain locked out of my property. Informative reviews are available from local media sources: Dallas Morning News/Kevin Krause/9-28-17, and CBS 11/ 11-17-17/Brian New.


You've made some good points there. I looked on the internet for additional information about the issue and found most people will go along with your views on this website


The other crime related to forfeiture is when some is convicted of a crime, pays full restitution in advance of sentencing, yet still has that same amount of cash seized as forfeiture IN ADDITION to those full restitution paid "because the DOJ can do so - even when all assets related to the crime have already been "disgorged". This is a form of fine that double penalizes someone IN ADDITION to a fine by a judge AND restitution. It is simple greed by DOJ because they get recognition for doing so. It is theft by the government without any due process or cause. It is blatantly and overtly wrong and unfair.


When you are 60 years old and police throw you in jail because a family member refuses to wear a wire, a judge keep you under a cash bond until you agree to forfeit everything that you have worked your whole life for ! Yes forfeiture should be illuminated! It’s just wrong! This is America!


Stay Informed