New Bill Limits When California Police Can Use Deadly Force

As a nation, we must address the brutal reality and deadly consequences of police violence. We have seen far too many people, particularly Black and brown people, killed by police. We have seen too many families and communities shattered by loss and tragedy. Enough is enough. We must limit when police officers can use deadly force and take someone’s life.

Current laws in California fail to protect against unnecessary killings by police officers. Officers here — and in much of the country — can use deadly force regardless of whether it was necessary to prevent death or serious bodily injury. They can kill even when alternatives to deadly force — like issuing a verbal warning, repositioning and calling for backup, or using lower levels of force — are available, safe, and feasible.

It is unacceptable that today in California police officers can legally kill someone even when they don’t have to.

Preserving and protecting human life must be the top concern for law enforcement officers, and our laws should likewise reflect that. Unfortunately, that is not the case. According to the California Department of Justice, police officers killed 172 Californians in 2017 alone, and they did so with startling racial disparities. Of the 172 people killed, more than two-thirds were people of color. Of those who were completely unarmed when killed by police, three quarters were people of color.

California police officers are not only killing people of color at disproportionate rates; they are also killing more people than most departments in the country. California police kill people at a rate 37 percent higher than the national per capita average. A 2015 report by the Guardian found that police in Kern County killed more people per capita than in any other county in the U.S.

The course of action is clear. California lawmakers must start by changing the standard for when police can use deadly force.

That’s why the ACLU of California affiliates — together with our partner organizations, including those led by people directly impacted by police violence — are supporting AB 392: The California Act to Save Lives. The legislation introduced on Wednesday specifically addresses police violence by updating California’s deadly use-of-force law.

AB 392 is a common-sense bill that is modeled after best practices already in place in some departments in the U.S. We know these practices work to reduce killings by police. As with these other bills, AB 392 will clarify that police officers can use deadly force only when there are no alternatives that would prevent death or serious bodily injury. Officers’ conduct leading up to a shooting will also be considered when determining whether deadly force is justified — not just the moment the officer pulls the trigger.

The California Department of Justice recently released a report recommending that the Sacramento Police Department update its use-of-force guidelines following the shooting death of Stephon Clark in Sacramento. Their guidelines align closely with AB 392. Specifically, they call for Sacramento police to more clearly define when force is authorized, require that officers use de-escalation whenever possible, and mandate that officers exhaust all reasonably available alternatives before using deadly force. 

Research shows that officers at agencies with stricter use-of-force policies kill fewer people and are less likely to be killed or seriously injured themselves. After Seattle implemented a new use-of-force policy that contains some of the same key elements that AB 392 does, a study by a federal court monitor showed that the policy significantly reduced mid-level and serious uses of force without any increase in injuries to officers or the crime rate.

There is no reason for California lawmakers to shy away from establishing stricter policies on deadly use of force that can prevent unnecessary shootings, keep officers safe, and ensure public safety. AB 392 is urgently needed because every day that goes by without addressing California’s epidemic of police violence is another day that a police officer may violently take another life.

View comments (23)
Read the Terms of Use

Anonymous

You are an idiot wrapped in a moron.

Anonymous

Police departments disqualify applicants with a high IQ and a sense of compassion. This is the official policy which has been upheld as legal by the courts.

Anonymous

Wow, where did you get those "facts"? You are clearly too stupid to live.

Anonymous

Just obey the law.

Pete wilson

Who do you think told them about who to make a police state, gave them armored vehicles, grants and all kinds of stuff for playing ball. You guessed it, the federal government. The illuminati wants a civil war and the police shooting people or falsely arresting people and perjuring themselves is leading to revolution.

Anonymous

Oh, for Pete's sake!!

Anonymous

I decided to stop donating to the ACLU because of similar articles being promoted by the ACLU. I truly support the view of the articles title, "New Bill Limits When California Police Can Use Deadly Force". I too have seen many times were police have turned to lethal force when there were alternatives choices to made before that point.
However, I do not like the fact that the ACLU continually uses race as their talking point. It could be equally argued that, the people you mentioned are equally responsible for placing themselves in those situations were lethal force should be used against them.

Anonymous

It could be argued, but it would be an argument devoid of contextual basis.

NoT JoHnnY

People need to stop dat killin before i get mad

Ms. Gloria Anasyrma

The ACLU censored my original comment here and all I did was quote that famous American philosopher Slim Pickens.

Pages

Stay Informed