Excluding Women from Combat Is Just Plain Wrong: A Navy Captain's Story

On January 24, 2013, we saw a great victory for U.S. servicewomen when the Department of Defense announced it was ending the ban on women serving in combat units and occupational specialties. As the Pentagon and the armed services begin implementing the change in policy, there are many issues that must be resolved, and we'll be keeping a close eye on the process. In an ongoing blog series, we will bring you voices of military experts, veterans, and other stakeholders who will discuss these issues and the need to fully integrate women in the armed forces.

During my 25-year career as a Navy officer and helicopter pilot, I was fortunate to witness firsthand the genuine skills and capabilities of U.S. servicewomen. But at the same time, these brave women were limited in their opportunities by arbitrary rules that had nothing to do with their abilities and, if anything, hurt the readiness of our military. I also saw women rise to the occasion when the policies that excluded them from certain positions yielded to the realities of modern warfare and the challenges of maintaining an effective fighting force.

I first had the chance to observe women break new ground in the military when I was stationed with the Navy's first female helicopter pilot (in the interest of full disclosure, I have to admit she happens to be my wife of 35 years).

When Joellen Drag first reported to her helicopter squadron in 1974, she was not allowed to hover over the fantail or flight deck of a Navy seagoing ship. She had the same training and abilities as her male counterparts, but she did not have the same opportunities to develop advanced qualifications and experience needed to compete for higher rank. But the law didn't just hurt Joellen's career—it also prevented our Navy from utilizing a skilled pilot.

To fight this unfair policy, Joellen joined a lawsuit challenging the federal law that stood in the way of her dream of following the footsteps of her father who was a career naval officer. Fortunately, the judge declared the law unconstitutional in 1978, and Joellen went on to have a successful career in the Navy, eventually retiring as a captain.

The legal battle was won. But the war was not. Fast-forward to 1991 and the first Gulf War. Women were everywhere in theater, doing just about everything they had been trained to do. I don't recall many questions about whether the law allowed them to be there, but I did know that women were essential to our preparation for combat operations. And I'm certain no commanding officer would want to lose a fully-qualified crew member just because she was, well, a she.

With the buildup essentially complete and Saddam Hussein not withdrawing from Kuwait, suddenly the lights went out in Bagdad. We were in a combat situation, complete with scud missiles fired at coalition forces and planes shot down. And again, no one questioned the presence of women doing what they were trained to do…or so I thought.

I was assigned to the staff of the Navy's logistics support force in Bahrain where I oversaw the operations of 32 shore-based planes and helicopters. One morning the officer-in-charge of one of the helicopter detachments appeared at my office door along with one of the female pilots assigned to the unit. They asked to speak with me, then stepped into my office and closed the door.

"Uh-oh," I thought. "This must not be good."

Turns out the night before, the female pilot was diverted from a routine ship resupply mission and ordered to fly to an oil platform off Kuwait City to pick up Iraqi soldiers who had been captured. Apparently word got back to the Wing Commander in Virginia that a female crewmember had flown into the combat zone, which was not permitted.

I assured the pilot she had done the right thing. As she departed my office, I also reminded the pilot to log combat flight time on her flight reports. My small actions may not have influenced what is the norm today, but it meant a lot to the women pilots for whom I felt a responsibility to treat with fairness and equality. After I passed this situation along to my admiral, I never heard another word. Rules aren't necessarily made to be broken, but this one was out of date.

In large part because of the Desert Shield/Desert Storm experiences, most restrictions on women serving on combatant vessels and aircraft were lifted in 1994, the same year the direct ground combat exclusion policy was put in place. Since then we've become very aware of what our servicewomen have done in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan, despite this policy. They've been decorated for heroism and have died for their country.

And so Joellen and I were elated when we learned that the Pentagon was finally rescinding the policy, knowing full-well what that meant to the thousands of women who are currently serving our country or who aspire to do so. From our own experience, we know that women have the ability to serve in combat roles and, in doing so, have made important contributions to our military readiness and capabilities. That's why, when the Pentagon works through the details in implementing the change in policy, it should open all occupations and units to women, allowing them to compete and serve in positions for which they are qualified and affording them opportunities to be promoted to the highest levels of leadership.

It's time to do away with the brass ceiling once and for all.

Captain Dwayne Oslund, USN (Ret.) served 25 years in the U.S. Navy. He was a helicopter pilot who commanded a primary training squadron in Corpus Christi, TX, with 90 male and female instructor pilots from a wide range of naval aviation communities. During that tour, his squadron trained over 250 men and women from the Navy and Marine Corps. He holds a Master of Science degree in Management with a specialty in Manpower, Personnel and Training Analysis from the Naval Postgraduate School, and also served as the Navy's Officer Promotion Planner on the staff of the Chief of Naval Operations. Shortly after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in August 1990, CAPT Oslund was among the first Navy personnel to forward deploy to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, when he led a small contingent to standup a Navy liaison element to US Central Command. He was subsequently assigned to the Navy logistics support force staff in Bahrain.

Learn more about combat exclusion and other civil liberty issues: Sign up for breaking news alertsfollow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

Add a comment (3)
Read the Terms of Use

Anonymous

If you are going to post articles and can't take criticism (delete comments) from a conservative combat arms perpective, then disable comments. You were not a grunt and are not qualified to comment on the subject. Liberals can't handle the truth.

Anonymous

Neither can conservatives. They can't handle ANY truths that they just don't FEEL like handling, and I'm not a Liberal when I say that. I've never been liberal, I grew up in a Republican family and still live around a pack of Republicans. And they can't handle any truths they don't WANT to handle. Like it's none of their gd business who decides to do WHAT with their own gd bodies. Like that Bush approved of torture and it was disgusting beyond words AND it ruined the chance of getting a clean conviction on the prisoners at Guantanamo. From a judge's own mouth it's ruined it. He said "Torture will be central to mitigation," meaning that even if they get convicted their sentencing will be more lenient b/c freakin' ass BUSH and company couldn't restrain their gd selves, couldn't control their gd testosterone long enough to consider the freakin' possible consequences, which they knew but elected to cast the knowledge to the winds in pursuit of torturing information from prisoners. They just figured nobody would find them out.

I don't know a single thing that a damn Republican can handle unless you agree with every damn thing they say.
I have no idea why someone would want to put themselves in the path of danger, I don't even understand why my brother wants to and I don't GIVE a crap if he's a man. He's still made of flesh and freakin' bones and can die by gunfire as fast as ANYone no matter HOW many extra legs they lack.

But for the record, there's like nothing BUT women police officers in Mesa Arizona, and they go out with a gun to do battle with those shadowy "bad guys with guns" on a damn daily basis and none of them is dead or stressed beyond the ability to do it.
The military's supposed to be even better training than the police academy. If women can be police officers it seems like women would be even better prepared to be soldiers.
I knew a woman soldier. I saw no difference between her ability to do things and an average man's. If they want to imagine there is one, they'll go right ahead and do it. I don't really care.
I have no idea why anybody wants to run around with a gun on them, but I'm sure that people of EITHER sex can do so b/c I've seen it from both.

from Richard, V...

With all due respect, I honestly wonder why any woman would WANT to see ground combat. This is not because of her gender. I also wonder it about males. I don't know any Veterans of Foreign wars who wouldn't gladly give away their medals of war if it meant the memories of warfare would disappear with them.
A fellow serviceman called me unpatriotic for this notion of wondering why people would actively seek OUT war, but I would have asked of him (in other circumstances) if he would keep his medals of bravery and honor if someone told him that giving them up would relieve him of the hidden scars of war, especially those obtained through guerrilla warfare in battles with an enemy who DIDN'T follow the Geneva Convention that WE were expected to follow at all times regardless of WHAT VC was doing. Which is admirable but a patently ridiculous expectation for keeping your butt alive.
I say be careful what you wish for, because you just might get it - and a whole lot more than you ever knew you wanted.

Sign Up for Breaking News