Senators Corker and Kaine Want to Give President Trump the Authority to Wage Worldwide War

This piece is a shortened version of Deputy Director of the ACLU’s Washington Legislative Office Christopher Anders’ testimony delivered before the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs’ Subcommittee on Federal Spending Oversight and Emergency Management on June 6, 2018.

No decision by the federal government is graver or more consequential than the decision to go to war.

Over the many years since Congress passed the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) of 2001, the ACLU has dedicated itself to defending the civil liberties and human rights that have been threatened as a result of this resolution and its successors. The harms have included the drone killings of American citizens, broad surveillance of American citizens, the kidnapping and torture of suspects, and indefinite detention without charge or trial, even of an American citizen apprehended in the United States.

Now, Sens. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and Tim Kaine (D-Va.) are working on a new AUMF that is even more damaging to our freedoms.

It would be hard to overstate the depth and breadth of the dangers to the Constitution, civil liberties, and human rights that the Corker-Kaine AUMF would cause. The Corker-Kaine AUMF would give the current president and all future presidents authority from Congress to engage in worldwide war, sending American troops to countries where we are not now at war and against groups that the president alone decides are enemies. 

Christopher Anders, ACLU Washington Legislative Office Deputy Director testifying to congress about Constitutional War Powers

The Corker-Kaine AUMF would authorize force, without operational limitations, against eight groups in six countries. The president could then add to both lists, as long as the president reports the expansion to Congress. To be clear — the president would have unilateral authority to add additional countries — including the United States itself — to the list of countries where Congress is authorizing war. And the president would have unilateral authority to add additional enemies, including groups in the United States itself and even individual Americans, under its new authority for the president to designate “persons” as enemies.

Their proposal also contains a sleeper provision with the innocuous title, “Sec. 10 Conforming Amendment,” that would create a new legal basis for the military to capture and imprison individuals in indefinite detention without charge or trial. This greatly expands the scope of the infamous indefinite detention provision in the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act. Like the NDAA, the Corker-Kaine AUMF has no statutory prohibition against locking up American citizens or anyone picked up in the United States itself. While we continue to believe it would still be unlawful for a president to try indefinite detention of an American citizen in the United States (again), there is no reason for Congress to risk it.

When Congress considered the NDAA detention provision in 2012, the uproar from across the political and ideological spectrum was deafening, but it narrowly passed, and President Obama signed it. He promised not to use it against American citizens, but without ever denying that he and future presidents have the power to order military detention. The loaded gun was left on the shelf. The Corker-Kaine AUMF would make the NDAA detention provision an even greater threat to civil liberties and human rights and hand them to President Trump as well as future presidents.

The damage from the Corker-Kaine AUMF would be colossal. Leaders in Congress must speak out against this new AUMF and hold strong to protect our liberties.

View comments (43)
Read the Terms of Use


Insanity has taken over.......the inmates at the nut house are in charge.........Trump shouldn't have the key to the fridge, let alone the power to wage war. Rant by rant, fake news spouting from his mouth, and vicious executive orders daily will drive our democracy to the road toward destruction.

Erlene Hendrix

This article , and especially the headline, is very misleading. Kaine has advocated strongly for years that the president's powers to wage war should be curtailed. This bill is not perfect, but is what he believes is possible in order to move in the direction of more Congressional oversight in the ability of the preside to wage war against other countries. There is controversy over the bill, but some analysis says it is better than water have now. At least change the headline to be less misleading.


Where do you get that explanation? It appears Kaine has become a Republican by giving more power to the lunatic in the White House. Trump is such an insecure bully that there is no doubt he will use this on individual American Citizens or leaders of other countries. The implications are too horrific to imagine.

Linda Z.

the same Tim Kaine who ran with Hillary? Really ?


Doesn't this scream dictatoship. This scares the hell out of me! What has our government come to under the current administration? I can't believe any politician would want to live under this type of leadership!


Up until now I had respect for Senator Kaine, what is he thinking??? This terrifying and totally wrong . Please call him out on this most dangerous proposal the AMIF , especially if you live in Virgina .

Jeff Lann

So if the bill is so bad, where is the text of the bill?

How about letting we, the people, decide based on the text of the bill. I find it curious that you invoke AUMF 2001 when the ACLU never once opposed that bill. Even Ron Paul voted for that bill. Is that why you went along with it?


What is Tim Kaine doing? Isn't this the guy who's been fighting for Congress to take back the responsibility to wage war? Perhaps the Democrats are not that serious about reigning in the US's global warmongering


Now is the time to exercise our duty to rise up against a tyrannical government, with prejudice.


WTH? With DJT in the White House?! Have they lost their bloominginds???!


Stay Informed