Court Tells Georgia It Can’t Charge People to Read the Law

In a victory for the people of Georgia, a federal appeals court ruled on Friday that the state can no longer charge individuals hundreds of dollars to see the laws that govern them.

To get there, the court relied on a central tenet of American democracy: The government works on behalf of the public.

Quoting the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit wrote, “The concept of popular sovereignty is deeply rooted in our politics, our law, and our history. The seminal statement of America’s political creed boldly proclaims that ‘[g]overnments ... deriv[e] their just powers from the consent of the governed.’”

For decades, Georgia ignored this reality. Rather than make the text of the law freely available, the state pay-walled access to the statutes, court opinions, and annotations that make up its official law.

In 2013, a nonprofit called Public.Resource.Org paid for a copy of the state’s official code and posted it online for free. The state responded to this act of public service by suing the organization for copyright infringement. Rather than give in, Public.Resource.Org argued that Georgia law is in the public domain.

Along with a number of other groups, the ACLU filed a friend-of-the-court brief to support the nonprofit. We argued that the state cannot claim a copyright in its law because copyright vests only in the author of a work — in this case, the public — and because giving the state a private property right in the law would violate the public’s First Amendment right of access as well as principles of due process.

The three-judge panel agreed, writing that under democratic rule, “lawmakers and judges are draftsmen of the law, exercising delegated authority, and acting as servants of the People.” As a result, when legislators and judges produce content, “the People are the true authors.” Or, put even more poetically, “When the legislative or judicial chords are plucked it is, in fact, the People’s voice that is heard.”

In reaching this conclusion, the court added to centuries of precedent holding that, in a democracy, the people are sovereign and so are the ultimate authors and owners of the law. This is the right vision of democracy — and in Georgia, it means the law is finally free.

View comments (25)
Read the Terms of Use

Anonymous

It was Trumped.

Nonymous

Perhaps igorance of the law IS an excuse in Georgia.

Ananda Moose

Ignorance of some kind surely is.

Jeff Kaufman

CUT THE CRAP! EITHER ACT LIKE YOU BELIEVE IN DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES OR GET THE HELL OUT OF THE WAY! WE'RE NO LONGER WILLING TO PUT UP WITH YOUR UNDERHANDED AND ESSENTIALLY EVIL WAYS.

Esmeralda

Georgia is a scary, scary place...

Anonymous

*the South is a scary, scary place

Anonymous

* The USA is a scary, scary place...

Dan howell

The real question in this case is why did it take till now for all these lawyers and judges to reach this decision? Why hasn't it ever been questioned before? It took a lawsuit to make ppl schooled in law and constitutional rights to finally see the obvious here?. Thats GA for you.

Anonymous

son of Jim Crow, Return of Jim Crow, Jim Crow IV......
maybe Georgia will be forced to stop with the sequels soon..,,,,

Anonymous

Georgia has been, and will continue to be, an invalid state until they fix their elections, fix their gerrymandering, fix thier education system, and fix their bigotry problem.

Pages

Stay Informed